An Official publication of The Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons (AsianCNS)

Search Article
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Advertise Subscribe Contacts Login  Facebook Tweeter
  Users Online: 198 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

   Table of Contents      
CASE REPORT
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 39-44

Low velocity penetrating head injury with impacted foreign bodies in situ


Department of Neurosurgery, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Date of Web Publication3-Oct-2011

Correspondence Address:
Rashim Kataria
Department of Neurosurgery, 53, Mauji Colony, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1793-5482.85635

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Penetrating head injury is a potentially life-threatening condition. Penetrating head injuries with impacted object (weapon) are rare. The mechanism of low velocity injury is different from high velocity missile injury. Impacted object (weapon) in situ poses some technical difficulties in the investigation and management of the victims, and if the anticipated problems are not managed properly, they may give rise to serious consequences. The management practice of eight patients with impacted object in situ in context of earlier reported similar cases in literature is presented.

Keywords: Impacted weapon in situ, low-velocity penetrating head injury, skull stab wound


How to cite this article:
Kataria R, Singh D, Chopra S, Sinha V D. Low velocity penetrating head injury with impacted foreign bodies in situ. Asian J Neurosurg 2011;6:39-44

How to cite this URL:
Kataria R, Singh D, Chopra S, Sinha V D. Low velocity penetrating head injury with impacted foreign bodies in situ. Asian J Neurosurg [serial online] 2011 [cited 2017 Jul 28];6:39-44. Available from: http://www.asianjns.org/text.asp?2011/6/1/39/85635


  Introduction Top


Brain is perforated by almost every conceivable object. [1] Gun-shot penetrating injuries are common but low-velocity penetrating injuries to the brain are rare in the western countries. [2] Incidence of low-velocity penetrating head injury cases in India and other under developing countries are usual particularly in rural areas due to interpersonal assault. The patients with the impacted assault weapon or foreign bodies rarely reach for surgery. Impacted object (weapon) poses difficulties in the investigation and normal operating procedure. If the impacted object is not removed carefully, it can cause further damage to the cerebral tissue or may lead to vascular injury. Unlike the penetrating injuries to the brain caused by missiles, injuries by stabbing are largely restricted to the wound tract. Early recognition, debridement, and judicious antibiotic therapy can limit or prevent complications in the management of stab wounds.


  Case Report Top


Eight patients of low-velocity penetrating head injury with impacted object in situ were admitted in the neurosurgical department of SMS Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India, during 10-year period (1995 to 2006). The surgery and management practice adopted in context of earlier reported similar cases is mentioned in the following [Table 1].


  Discussion Top


Transcranial penetrating wounds are though not common but well known. [2] The method of killing a person by driving nails into the brain can be found in the Holy Bible, where it is described in the Book of Judges. [3] This method is also depicted in the novel "By the open sea" [4] of a well-known Swedish author, August Strindberg (1849-1912) with reference to the violent act as "the good old method of the nail" suggesting that the method has been known for long time in Sweden. Gun-shot injuries are more prevalent in the united states, with firearm injury being the second only to motor vehicle collisions in causing traumatic deaths. [5] In South Africa, because of very strict gun control laws, stab wounds of skull from sharp edge weapons are relatively common. [6]

Pilcher [1] observed that transcranial stab wounds have been caused by a variety of objects commonest being the knife blade. Others include pitch fork prongs, [7] door keys, [8] fishing harpoon, [9] rotor fan blade, [10] grinder tool, [11] ceramic stone, [12] iron rod, nail, [13],[14] hunting arrow, [15] wood, [16] toilet brush handle, [17] coat hanger, [18] bicycle brake handle, [19],[20] stone, [21] mains plug, [22] etc. In our cases, the assault weapons included sickle, scissors, compass, fan blade, metal strip, wood, and stone.

Penetrating head injuries of the head and neck are uncommon in children but are potentially life threatening. They are usually seen in adults. [23] The incidence of septic complication in children is significantly higher than that seen in adults, [24 ] stab wounds passing through an air sinus or oropharyngeal mucosa before entering cranium increase wound infection in contrast to calvarial stab. The most commonly encountered types of penetrating head injuries are industrial accidents, suicidal attempts, and assault.

High incidences of stab on the left side of skull are probably due to right-handedness of the assailant except when the victim is hit from the back. [25] The most common injury site is the frontoparietal region. [25] Temporal stab wounds are more likely to demonstrate major neurological deficits. Penetration is facilitated by thinness of the temporal bone and because of short distance to the deep vital brain and vascular structures. [26] Stab wounds at the craniocervical junction are also reported. [27] Intracranial complications of transorbital stab wounds include meningitis, injury to the carotid artery leading to carotid cavernous fistula, false aneurysm of the artery, and injury to the cavernous sinus. [28]

Injuries caused by stab wound evoke similar therapeutic consideration as in cases of missile injuries but these are modified primarily by a general absence of significant impact force and its deleterious secondary consequence resulting in good recovery. The kinetic energy (΍ΧmassΧvelocity΂) by an object dissipated into the tissues determines the type of injury inflicted. Thus, velocity squarely affects the tissue destruction. At low velocity (i.e, below 300 m/sec) injury results from direct disruption and laceration of tissues while at high velocities, tissue cavitation and shock waves are the main cause of cerebral damage and poor prognosis.

Immediate radiological examination is mandatory because small entrance wound usually does not correspond with size of the foreign body and associated intracranial injury. A trivial wound in an asymptomatic patient may lead to death within few days to weeks later because of rupture of a traumatic intracranial aneurysm or infection. [29] Plain radiograph of the skull is useful to delineate the depth and direction of penetration. [2] It quickly reveals the presence of slot fracture beneath a trivial scalp laceration. CT scan is mandatory to diagnose intracranial injuries, associated contusion, hematoma, major vascular injury, or brainstem injury. It is an essential means in decision making of surgical strategy. [30]

It may be difficult to interpret CT scan due to the presence of metal artifact. [2] One may need to change CT "windows" levels to decrease the interference from metal artifact. [31] The computed tomography images obtained at standard window widths and window density levels may not reveal the presence of stony material because of the chemical structure similar to bone and it may not show any artifacts in the computed tomography scans. [22] Impacted wooden objects are often missed in routine investigation done for head trauma. Despite modern radiological imaging, a transorbital intracranial injury with a wooden foreign body can present a vexing diagnostic problem. Wood appear like air bubble on CT scan, so wooden foreign body can be missed. Misinterpretation of CT findings in these cases may delay the adequate treatment, whereas MRI is more sensitive and specific. [32]

Cerebral angiography may be indicated if injury to a major cerebral vessel or venous sinus is suspected and in cases of delayed Subarachnoid hemorhage or intracerebral hemorrhage. [2] If vascular injury is detected a decision regarding the advisability of endovascular or surgical treatment can be made with adequate exposure of the proximal vessels in the area of injury. Postoperative CT scan should be performed to exclude the presence of delayed hemorrhage. An interesting fact to the subject of penetrating knife injury of skull is that when knife blade is removed by the assailant the prognosis is worse as compared to the situation so long as it is left in situ.This is because the sea-saw movement of object during removal may cause further damage. [26] Retained knife may prevent hemorrhage by tamponade effect on an injured vessel. [31] Low-velocity injury with a smooth instrument reduces the amount of tissue damage. [33] If a patient has a relatively superficial impacted object in situ is neurologically intact and without a demonstrable intracranial lesion on plain radiographs and CT scan, the risk of vascular injury is low. The object could be removed under general anesthesia in the operation theatre without the need for preoperative cerebral angiography. The patient is then observed for neurological deterioration with postoperative CT scans. If the impacted object has deeply penetrated into the brain in the vicinity of major vessel, cerebral angiography is necessary prior to surgical removal of the foreign objects. Our experience of managing patients with major vascular injury is limited. In our cases, we made multiple burr holes around the weapon (object) and craniectomy was done. The impacted weapon was gently removed along with the bone pieces. We ensured that rocking movements of the knife during withdrawal is minimized, as this could lead to further damage to the underlying brain. The weapon should always be withdrawn in a direct reverse path of trajectory. [34]

Van Dallen [26] advised skin incision extended vertically along the length of the wound produced by knife intrusion to enable skin and soft tissue reflection wherever possible. It may be necessary to make T-shaped incision and the safest method of bone removal is to make D-shaped craniectomy. The knife blade is allowed to rest against the flat vertical segment of the D providing stability, so as to provide sufficient access to control hemorrhage. A brain retractor is then gently slid alongside of the knife blade to expose tip of knife. The blade is then withdrawn. This provides a method of removal with least amount of additional trauma and access to a deeper structure.


  Results Top


Present study is confined over three adults and five children who were admitted in the neurosurgical ward, SMS Hospital, Jaipur, during 1995-2006. The patients were timely operated by standard operation procedures. The most commonly encountered types of penetrating head injuries are industrial accidents, suicidal attempts, and criminal assault. Two patients resulted from assault, one of them had self-inflicted injury in suicidal attempt and four were accidental. We have included only those cases who presented to us with impacted weapon in situ. We used intravenous Ceftriaxone and Gentamycin as prophylactic antibiotics in all cases. Phenytoin was used as prophylactic anticonsulvant in the cases where cerebral cortex injury was seen.

In context of earlier reviewed cases and from our own experience, we learnt that removal of impacted sharp weapons should only be done in the operation theatre so as to avoid further brain damage. Removal of the foreign object is in the direction of trajectory without zig-zag movements. The skin incision was made S-shaped around the site of entry of the weapon. Plain radiographs of the skull and preferably CT scan should be performed to ascertain the direction of the trajectory of the weapon.


  Conclusion Top


Low-velocity penetrating head injury injuries in developing countries like India are not uncommon and are usually seen in rural setup and mainly because of interpersonal assault. The extent of damage of tissues depends on the type, shape, size, site, and the velocity of sharp weapon as well as on the extent of its penetration at the impacted site. X-ray skull is essentially done to assess the location and the nature of injury, the driven bone fragment and foreign body within the brain. CT scan helps in the visualization of the entire head, nature of intracranial injury, hemorrhage, edema, tract of lesion, intracranial bony and metallic fragments, and intracranial air. Craniectomy around the foreign body, debridement, and removal of foreign body without zigzag motion is needed.[Figure 1],[Figure 2],[Figure 3],[Figure 4],[Figure 5],[Figure 6],[Figure 7],[Figure 8].
Figure 1: (a) X-ray skull (lat view) showing sickle in situ. (b) CT Scan head (Postoperative) after removal of the sickle, shows small contusion (arrow) at the operated site. (c) Line diagram of the skin incision (white arrow), craniotomy (thin black arrow)

Click here to view
Figure 2: (a) X-ray skull (AP view) showing compass in situ in the right temporal region (arrow) (b) Line diagram of the skin incision (white arrow), cranictomy done (thin black arrow) around the neddle of compass (thick black arrow)

Click here to view
Figure 3: (a) CT scan head axial cut showing metal artifact in the midline(thin black arrow) (b) CT scan (topogram) head showing scissors in situ (c) Line diagram of the skin incision (white arrow), craniotomy (thin black arrow)

Click here to view
Figure 4: (a) Pre-operative photograph of patient with fan blade injury, showing metal piece (arrow) embedded in the brain, (b) shows line diagram of the skin incision (white arrow), craniotomy (thin black arrow)

Click here to view
Figure 5: Child with impacted metal strip (white arrow). No incision was inflicted and it was removed in the operation theatre and the cranial CT scan did not reveal any abnormality

Click here to view
Figure 6: (a) X-ray skull AP view showing bone defect (arrow). Wood is radiolucent, (b) CT head showing hypodensity (mimicking air) at the site of impacted wooden object along with contusion along the anteromedial aspect, (c) Line diagram of the skin incision (white arrow). (d) Wooden piece delivered after surgery

Click here to view
Figure 7: (a) X-ray skull showing hyperdensity (stone) in frontal region (arrow), (b) Stone delivered after surgery, (c) shows line diagram of the skin incision (white arrow)

Click here to view
Figure 8: (a) Impacted stone in the left frontal region, (b) CT scan head showing a depressed fracture frontal region with impacted stone (arrow), (c) X-ray skull (AP view) showing radiopaque shadow (stone) in the frontal region, (d) shows line diagram of the lacerated wound (white arrow) around the impacted stone (black arrow)

Click here to view


 
  References Top

1.Pilcher C. Penetrating wounds of the brain: An experimental study. Ann Surg 1936;103:173-98.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Herring CJ, Lumsden AB, Tindall SC, Transcranial stab wounds: A report of three cases and suggestions for management. Neurosurgery 1988;23:658-62.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.The holy Bible. Book of Judges 4. 21-22.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.August Strindberg: "By the open sea" Translated to English by Ellie Schleussner. New York: Heubsch; 1913. p. 310-2.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.From the centers for disease control and prevention. Deaths resulting from firearm- and motor-vehicle-related injuries- United States, 1968-1991. JAMA 1994;271:495-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Taylor AG, Peter JC. Patients with retained transcranial knife blades: A high-risk group. J. Neurosurg;1997;87:512-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Kesteven WB, Harris FH. Case of a boy, aet.13, Who Lay for nine days after a fall, in which one of the prongs of a farming fork had passed through the brain. Trans Path Soc of London;1874;25:13.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Seex K, Koppel D, Fitzpatrick M, Pyott A. Trans-orbital penetrating head injury with a door key. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997;25:353-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.López F, Martínez-Lage JF, Herrera A, Sánchez-Solís M, Torres P, Palacios MI, et al. Penetrating craniocerebral injury from an underwater fishing harpoon. Childs Nerv Syst 2000;16:117-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Kumar A, Singh H, Sharma KC. Penetrating Head Injury from a Pedestal Fan Rotor Blade in a Child - An Unusual Case. Pediatr Neurosurg 2006;42:391-4.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Abdoli A, Amirjamshidi A. Work-Related Penetrating Head Trauma Caused by Industrial Grinder Tool. Arch Iran Med 2009;12:496-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Satyarthee GD, Borkar SA, Tripathi AK, Sharma BS. Transorbital penetrating cerebral injury with a ceramic stone: Report of an interesting case. Neurol India 2009;57:331-3.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
13.Lazic T, Strugar J. Nail in the midbrain. Neurology 2009;72:1531.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Shakir A, Koehler SA, Wecht CH. A review of nail gun suicides and an atypical case report. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:409-13.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.O'Neill OR, Gilliland G, Delshaw JB, Purtzer TJ. Transorbital pentrating head injury with a hunting arrow: Case report. Surg Neurol 1994;42:494-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Ferguson FN. A penetrating wound of the skull and brain. NY Med J 1896;64:360.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Farhadi MR, Becker M, Stippich C, Unterberg AW, Kiening KL. Transorbital penetrating head injury by a toilet brush handle. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009;151:685-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Solarino B, Reckentwald K, Burrows-Beckham. An unusual case of child head injury by coat hanger. AM J Forensic Sci 2008;53:1188-90.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Chattopadhyay S, Sukul B, Das SK. Fatal transorbital head injury by bicycle brake handle. J Forensic Leg Med 2009;16:352-3.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Agrawal A, Pratap A, Agrawal CS, Kumar A, Rupakheti S. Transorbital orbitocranial penetrating injury due to bicycle brake handle in a child. Pediatr Neurosurg 2007;43:498-500.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Balak N, Aslan B, Serefhan A, Elmaci I. Intracranial retained stone after depressed skull fracture: Problems in the initial diagnosis. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2009;30:198-200.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Kanagarajan A, Sgouros S. Unusual penetrating cranio-cerebral injuries in children from mains plugs. Childs Nerv Syst 2007;23:1181-3.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Orbay A. S Unusual penetrating faciocranial injury caused by a knife: A case report. J Craniomaxillofacial Surg 1997;25:279-81.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Domingo Z, Peter JC, de Villiers JC. Low-velocity penetrating craniocerebral injury in childhood. Pediatr Neurosurg 1994;21:45-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Van Dallen JR, Lipschitz R. Stab wounds of the skull. Surg Neurol 1978; 10:110-4.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Haworth CS, De Villiers JC. Stab wounds to the temporal fossa. Neurosurgery 1988;23:431-5.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.de Villiers JC, Grant AR. Stab wounds at the craniocervical junction. Neurosurgery 1985;17:930-6.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.De Villiers JC, Sevel D. Intracranial complications of transorbital stab wounds. Br J Ophthalmology 1975;59:52-6.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Kieck CF, de Villiers JC. Vascular lesions due to transcranial stab wounds. J Neurosurgery1984;60:42-46.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Nakayama Y, Tanaka A, Atria T, Kumate S, Yoshiga S. Penetrating head injury caused by weed: Case report. Brain and Nerve 1995;47:1192-4.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Taylor AG, Peter JC. Patients with retained transcranial knife blades: A high-risk group. J Neurosurg 1997;87:512-5.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Smely C, Orszagh M. Intracranial transorbital injury by a wooden foreign body: Re-evaluation of CT and MRI findings. Br J Neurosurg 1999;13:206-11.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Gurdjian ES,Webster JE. Head Injury. Boston and Toronto: Little Brown and Co.; 1958. p. 222-93.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Domingo Z, Peter JC, de Villiers JC. Low-velocity penetrating craniocerebral injury in childhood. Pediatr Neurosurg 1994;21:45-9.  Back to cited text no. 34
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Skull-Embedded Earring due to a Fall
Krista Helleman,Kathleen Andres,Jooho Lee,Karen Elaine Forward,Rodrick Lim
Pediatric Emergency Care. 2016; 32(10): 696
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Nonmissile Penetrating Injury to the Head: Experience with 17 Cases
Forhad H. Chowdhury,Mohammod Raziul Haque,Zahed Hossain,Noman Khaled Chowdhury,Sarwar Murshed Alam,Mainul Haque Sarker
World Neurosurgery. 2016; 94: 529
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Nonmissile Penetrating Head Injuries: Surgical Management and Review of the Literature
Xi-Sheng Li,Jun Yan,Chang Liu,Yu Luo,Xing-Sheng Liao,Liang Yu,Shao-Wen Xiao
World Neurosurgery. 2016;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Phineas Gage revisited: Modern management of large-calibre penetrating brain injury
BD Mitchell,BD Fox,WE Humphries,A Jalali,S Gopinath
Trauma. 2012; 14(3): 263
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
<
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Case Report
  Discussion
  Results
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4995    
    Printed113    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded495    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal