An Official publication of The Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons (AsianCNS)

Search Article
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Advertise Subscribe Contacts Login  Facebook Tweeter
  Users Online: 533 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

   Table of Contents      
CASE REPORT
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 101-105

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and closed head injury: A case report and review


1 Department of Anesthesia/ICU, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar

Date of Web Publication23-Jan-2012

Correspondence Address:
Nissar Shaikh
Department of Anesthesia/ICU, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha
Qatar
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1793-5482.92173

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare, but potentially lethal neurological emergency. Fifty percent of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients will have emotional disorders and post-traumatic agitations. Haloperidol is a neuroleptic antipsychotic medication commonly used in the traumatic brain injury patients due to its advantage of no effect on respiration and conscious level. But it is one of the common medications causing NMS. A 19-year-old male driver involved in the road traffic accident had an acute subdural hematoma, which was immediately evacuated. Postoperatively, he was awake. He was weaned from ventilator and extubated. He received 20 mg of intravenous haloperidol in divided doses with in 24 hours to control his agitation. Next day, he became drowsy, spastic, febrile, and tachycardic with labile blood pressure. He was diagnosed to have NMS, needed intubation, aggressive hydration and pharmacological treatment with dentrolene sodium and bromocriptin. He was weaned from ventilator and extubated on day 17. He was transferred to the ward and then discharged to be followed in out-patient clinic. NMS in head injury patient is rare and difficult to diagnose. Diagnosis of NMS should be suspected if two of the four cardinal signs and symptoms are developed following the use of neuroleptic or dopamine agonist medication withdrawal.

Keywords: Head injury, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, neuroleptics


How to cite this article:
Shaikh N, Al-Sulaiti G, Nasser A, Rahman MA. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and closed head injury: A case report and review. Asian J Neurosurg 2011;6:101-5

How to cite this URL:
Shaikh N, Al-Sulaiti G, Nasser A, Rahman MA. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and closed head injury: A case report and review. Asian J Neurosurg [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Oct 15];6:101-5. Available from: http://www.asianjns.org/text.asp?2011/6/2/101/92173


  Introduction Top


Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is ostensibly rare, but potentially lethal neurological emergency. NMS is characterized by mental status changes, muscle rigidity, hyperthermia, autonomic dysfunction, leukocytosis, and raised serum creatinine phospokinase levels. [1] The diagnosis of NMS in head injury patients is difficult, as these patients had neurological changes. NMS if not diagnosed early and treated properly can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. We report a case of NMS in closed head injury patient which was successfully treated in our intensive care unit.


  Case Report Top


A 19-year-old male driver involved in the road traffic accident, brought to emergency department with head injury and Glasgow coma score of 6. Skeletal survey revealed fracture humerus. Immediately resuscitated, intubated. Computerized tomography (CT) showed subdural hematoma and underwent craniotomy and evacuation of the hematoma, postoperatively shifted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). His neurological status improved, weaned, and extubated on day 5. He was restless but obeying commands. He was transferred to the ward on day 7.

In ward for his agitation, he had received intravenous haloperidol 20 mg in divided doses over 24 hours. On day 10, he became highly febrile (39°C), spastic and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) decreased to 10, and had leukocytosis (23×10 3 /mm 3 ). CT brain did not show any new changes with the working diagnosis of meningitis; he was started on antibiotics, shifted back to SICU. He remained highly febrile (40°C) and his central venous pressure was 1, with labile blood pressure and tachycardia. On day 11, he was more spastic, febrile (40.5°C) and his GCS deteriorated to 8, immediately intubated and ventilated. His serum creatinine kinase was elevated (7481 U/L). Septic workup was negative. CT brain was not showing new changes. After reviewing his medication, we found that he received significant dose of haloperidol (20 mg) in divided doses over 24 hours, and the next day, he started to have the rigidity, fever, leukocytosis, increased creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels, and deterioration of the level of consciousness. He was diagnosed as a case of NMS, stopped the haloperidol and antibiotics. Continued aggressive fluid resuscitation, aggressive pharmacological and surface cooling measure, added dentrolene sodium 3 mg/Kg/intravenous every 8 hours and bromocriptin 2.5 mg twice daily through nasogastric tube. On day 13, he became less restless, less febrile, and tachycardic and blood pressure became more stable. By day 15, he started to obey simple commands, fever subsided. Weaned and extubated on day 17. He was afebrile, no more spasticity and he was fully awake. Dentrolene sodium was stopped on day 18. He was transferred to the ward on day 20. On day 28, he underwent open reduction and internal fixation of fracture humerus. All standard precautions were taken for the possibility of malignant hyperthermia. He had no any perioperative complications. Bromocriptin was stopped on day 31. He was discharged home on day 33, to be followed in out patient clinics.


  Discussion Top


NMS was first described in French literature as 'syndrome malin'. [2] NMS is a hypodopamenergic state due to the neuroleptic medications causing severe rigidity, fever, autonomic dysfunction, and altered mental status. Millions of people all over the world suffer traumatic brain injury and up to 50% of these patients will suffer from emotional disorders and post-traumatic agitations. The pharmacological treatments of these emotional liabilities are benzodiazepines, antipsychotic, antidepressant, and beta-blockers. [3]

Haloperidol is a typical neuroleptic antipsychotic medication commonly used in the traumatic brain injury patients due to its advantage of no effect on respiration and conscious level. But it is one of the common medications causing NMS. [4]

Epidemiology

Literature about NMS associated with head injury patients is limited to the case reports only. Total nine cases of NMS are reported with use of haloperidol [Table 1] in the traumatic brain injury patients. [2],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] Younger patients are at higher risk for the development of NMS, it is twice more common in male, the reported incidence of NMS with use of haloperidol is ranging from 0.02 to 12.2%. [4]
Table 1: Reported neuroleptic malignant syndrome in head injury patients

Click here to view


Risk factors

The main risk factors for the development of NMS are [12] (i) high doses of neuroleptics (ii) rapid increase in dose of neuroleptics (iii) parentral neuroleptics (iv) use of highly potent neuroleptics (v) preexisting central nervous system disorders (vi) dehydration (vii) young patients (viii) history of NMS (xi) concomitant use of predisposing medications (lithium) (x) acute medical and surgical illness (infection, trauma and surgery) (xi) anti- Parkinsonism More Details medication withdrawal. Recently, a case is reported where high protein enteral feeding causing decreased levodopa (anti-Parkinsonism medication) concentration leading to NMS or neuroleptic malignant like syndrome. [13]

Pathphysiology

NMS is a hypodopaminergic state of the brain. Dopamine has a major role in autonomic cardiovascular stability, hypothalamic temperature regulation, maintaining the conscious level, and normal muscle tone. NMS results of either altered dopaminergic transmission or blockade of dopaminergic pathway or changes in pre/post synaptic dopamine signal activity. Neuroleptic causes blocked of the dopamine receptors, adding to it the traumatic brain (TBI) injury patients, due to diffuse axonal injury had a decreased dopamine neurotransmission. This combine effect leads to hypodopaminergic state and causing signs and symptoms of NMS. [11]

Evidence of central dopaminergic mechanism is drawn from the idea that 95% of NMS patients develop Parkinsonion symptoms. The muscular dysfunction (spasticity) with hyperthermia invokes the clinical similarity to the malignant hyperthermia. Plasma and urinary catecholamines changes in NMS patient's supports the involvement of sympathetic nervous system. Central dopaminergic blocked or hypodopaminergic condition in hypothalamus leads to hyperthermia, where as interference with nigrostratal dopaminergic pathway causes Parkinsonion symptoms (rigidity and tremors).

The involvement of peripheral muscular system in NMS patients is either due to rigidity or direct changes in the muscle mitochondrial functions, as a result of direct toxic effect of neuroleptic on skeletal muscles. [9] The primary role played by sympathetic nervous system dysfunction also may lead to increased muscle metabolism, labile blood pressure, tachycardia, and ineffective heat loss. Familial clusters of NMS suggestive of genetic predisposition, presence of specific allele of dopamine (D2) receptor gene is over represented in NMS. [10] Recently, the imaging study revealed that selective cerebellum and basal ganglia injury occurs in NMS patients. [14]

Diagnosis

Diagnosis of NMS in patient with TBI is a tough job, as these patients common to have disturbed conscious level, fever, increased CPK due to associated blunt trauma. Diagnosis of NMS will need high index of suspicion with history of receiving neuroleptic medications and same time rule-out sepsis, worsening brain injury or meningitis.

In NMS patients, there will be history of recent administration of neuroleptic medications and disturbance of the conscious level, fever, diaphoresis, autonomic dysfunction manifested by tachycardia and labile blood pressure, lead-pipe rigidity, and tremors.

The laboratory work-up will show raised CPK, leukocytosis and increased level of hepatic transaminase, but these are nonspecific. [15] CPK typically more than 1000 IU/liter and it correlates with the degree of rigidity. Serum electrolytes, coagulation profile, serum myoglobin, and complete blood count are important to be known. Cerebrospinal fluid examination and radiological scan of the brain will rule-out other pathological conditions affecting the neurological status. NMS develops following initiation or increased dose of neuroleptic medications, but it can occur at any time of neuroleptic therapy even after few months, 90% of NMS cases reported with in 10 days of neuroleptic administration (average of 4-14 days). The typical manifestation of NMS evolves over one to three days. Manifestations of NMS are tetrad neurological changes, muscular rigidity, hyperthermia, and autonomic dysfunction. The initial symptoms are neurological changes in 82% of NMS patients. The neurological manifestations are ranging from delirium, confusion, agitation, and catatonia to coma. [15] Muscular rigidity is extreme, generalized, and typical 'lead pipe' type. Other motor abnormalities in these patients include in up to 92% of the cases tremors, less common are dystonia, chorea, and dyskinasia. [15] Hyperthermia is one of the main symptoms of NMS. Eighty percent of NMS patient's temperature is more than 38°C and in up to 40% of NMS patients fever is greater than 40°C. [15] The autonomic instability in 80% of NMS patients is tachycardia, labile blood pressure in 77%, and tachypnea in up to 73%. Profuse diaphoresis is common, but rarely fatal dysrhythmia can occur. [16]

Differential diagnosis

Detail medical and drug history from the relatives or patients file is of vital importance in differentiating the following conditions from NMS (1) NMS should be differentiated from serotonin syndrome [Table 2]; in serotonin syndrome patient will have history of serotonin agonist intake, these patients are hyper reactive and usually serotonin syndrome resolves within 24 hours; [17] (2) Malignant hyperthermia, commonly associate and immediate to occur after the use of depolarizing muscle relaxant or inhalational anesthetics; (3) Heat stroke, history of exposed to high temperature will differentiate it from NMS; (4) Central anticholinergic syndrome, it is associated with the use of anticholinergic medications; (5) Malignant catatonia; (6) Adverse interaction of monoamine oxidase inhibitors; and (7) Central nervous system infections. [18]
Table 2: Differences between serotonin syndrome and Neuroleptic malignant syndrome

Click here to view


Treatment

Apart from early diagnosis, the aggressive medical treatment in intensive care set-up is essential for better outcome of these NMS patients. Stopping the causative neuroleptic is the primary step. Aggressive treatment of dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and pharmacological or surface cooling for body temperature control is an important aspect of the therapy. Some of these patients will require airway protection and ventilatory support. If patient had rhabdomyolysis, aggressive fluid resuscitation with forced diuresis will be needed; these patients may have renal failure which will require renal replacement therapy. [19]

Maintenance of hemodynamic is also an important aspect of management of NMS patients. Clonidine will be effective in NMS patients with tachycardia, hypertension, and restlessness. [20] NMS patients with arrhythmia will need antiarrhythmic medications even the pace maker may be indicated. [16] The medication therapy starts with stopping of the causative or precipitating medications and immediate resumption of dopaminergic medications. Most commonly used medications in the treatment of NMS are dentrolene sodium and bromocriptin. Dentrolene sodium is a direct skeletal muscle relaxant, typical daily dose is one to three mg intravenous and the maximum dose is 10 mg/kg/day. Its action starts with in minutes of administration and causes reduction in rigidity and heat production. It is commonly given for 10 days. Its dose should be tapered before stopping. [21] Bromocriptin is a dopamine agonist; it will restore the lost dopaminergic tone. It is given in the dose of 2.5 mg to start every six to eight hours oral or through nasogastric tube and can be titrated to a maximum dose of 40 mg per day. It should be continued for 10 days after the control of NMS and should be tapered before stopping. The use of dentrolene and bromocriptin will hasten the recovery from NMS and time for complete recovery will be reduced. This medication therapy will also improve the outcome in these patients. [22] Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is required in NMS patients with catatonia, patients not responding to the medical therapy. The cardiovascular complications and requirement of general anesthesia are the safety concerns with ECT therapy. Standard precautions for these concerns should be taken during the ECT therapy. [21]

Complications

NMS can be complicated with rhabdomyolysis, renal failure, seizers, respiratory failure, aspiration pneumonia, arrhythmia, residual catatonia, myopathic contractures, and decompensation of the psychiatric disease result of withdrawal of neuroleptics. [22] NMS patients can develop extensive deep venous thrombosis despite of being on thromboprophylaxis. [23]

Prognosis

NMS patients usually recover with in two weeks; the reported is ranging from 3 to 35%. [18] The mortality is high in critical ill patients and patients developing the complications such as renal failure. None of the cases reported NMS in head injury patients had mortality. [4] Higher levels of CPK in these patients indicate the severity of the disease and correlate with the higher mortality. Dentrolene and bromocriptin therapy will reduce the morbidity and mortality in NMS patients. [4]


  Recommendations and Conclusion Top


NMS is a rare life threatening neurological emergency associated with the use of neuroleptic medications. Only nine cases of NMS in TBI patients are reported in the literature. The early diagnosis and management will have better outcome in these patients. NMS in head injury patient is difficult to diagnose. High index of suspicion is essential for early diagnosis of NMS. Diagnosis of NMS should be suspected if two of the four cardinal signs and symptoms are developed (neurological deterioration, rigidity, hyperthermia, and autonomic nervous system disorders) following the use of neuroleptic or dopamine agonist withdrawal. NMS should be differentiated from serotonin syndrome, malignant hyperthermia, heat stroke, central anticholinergic syndrome, and central nervous system infections. Treatment of NMS patients starts with stopping the neuroleptic medication, aggressive supportive care (hydration, temperature control, correction of the electrolyte imbalance, arrhythmia, and hypertension). Pharmacological therapy with dentrolene and bromocriptin will decrease the duration, morbidity, and mortality in NMS patients. Electroconvulsive therapy is indicated if patients are not responder to the medical therapy or NMS associated with malignant catatonia. A higher level of CPK indicates severity of NMS and will have higher mortality. NMS patients with aspiration pneumonia, rhabdomyolysis , and acute renal failure will have significant higher mortality.

 
  References Top

1.Sukla I, Singh O, Rahman N. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in critical care unit. IJCCM 2006;10:50-1.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Vincent FM, Zimmerman JE. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome complicating head injury. Neurosurg 1986;18:190-3.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Mysiw WJ, Sandel MI. The agitated brain injury patients, Part II. Pathophysiology and treatment. Arch phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:213-20.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Bellamy CJ, Kane- Gill, Sandra L, Falcione BA, Seybert AL. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in traumatic head patients treated with haloperidol. J Trauma 2009;66:954-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Heird SB, Rhoads JE, Agarwal NN. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a trauma patient: Case report. J Trauma 1989;29:1595-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Hirst R, Galloway GQ, Borzotta AP. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: Case report in a multiple trauma patient. Injury 1993;24:193-4.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Perez-vela JL, Casado MS, Sanchez-Izquierdo Riera JA, Ambros Checa A, Caballero Cubedo R, Alted Lopez E. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in patient with head injury. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:593-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Burke C, Fulda GJ, Castellano J. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a trauma patient. J Trauma 1995;39:796-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
9.Wilkinson R, Meythaler JM, Guin-Renfroe S. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome induced by haloperidol following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 1999;13:1025-31.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Trasmonte J, Dayner J, Barron T. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in an adolescent head trauma patient. Clin Pediatr 1999;38:611-3.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Kadyan V, Colachis SC, Depalma MJ, Sanderson JD, Mysiw WJ. Early recognization neuroleptic malignant syndrome during truamtic brain injury rehabiltation. Brain Inj 2003;17:631-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
12.Strawn JR, Keck PE, Caroff SN. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:870-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Bonnici A, Ruiner CE, St Laurent L, Hornstein D. An Interaction between levodopa resulting in neuroleptic malignant like syndrome and prolonged ICU stay. Ann Pharmacother 2010;44:1504-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Lyons JL, Cohen AB. selective cerebellum and basal ganglia injury occurs in Neuroleptic malignant syndrome patients. J Neuroimaging 2011;xx:1-2.   Back to cited text no. 14
    
15. Kline AE, Massucci JL, Zafonte RD, Dixon CE, DeFeo JR, Rogers EH. Differential effects of single versus multiple administrations of haloperidol and risperidone on functional outcome after experimental brain injury. Crit Care Med 2007;35:919-24.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Parry AK, Ormerod LP, Hamlin GW, Saleem PT. Recurrent sinus arrest in association with Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Br J Psychiatry 1994;164:689-91.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.Steele D, Keltner NL, McGuiness TM. Are neuroleptic malignant syndrome and serotonin syndrome are the same syndrome. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2011;47:58-62.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
18.Kaufman KR, Levitt MJ, Schiltz JF, Sunderram J. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and serotonin syndrome in critical care settings. Case analysis. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2006;18:201-4.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.Lappa A, Podesta M, Capelli O, Castagna A, Di Placido G, Alampi D, et al. Successful treatment of a complicated case of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:976-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Gregorakos L, Thomaides T, Stratouli S, Sakayanni E. Use clonidine in the management of autonomic over activity in neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Clin Auton Res 2000;10:93-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Trollor JN, Sachdev PS. Electroconvulsive therapy of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. A review and report of cases. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 1999;33:650.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Bhanushali MJ, Tuite PJ. The evaluation and management of patients with neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Neurol Clin 2004;22:389-411.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
23.Mathew JC, Pillai U, Lacasse A. Extensive deep venous thrombosis despite of being on thromboprophylaxis. Case reports in Psychiatry 2011/doi:10.1155/2011/258172  Back to cited text no. 23
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Drugs for behavior disorders after traumatic brain injury: Systematic review and expert consensus leading to French recommendations for good practice
D. Plantier,J. Luauté
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2016; 59(1): 42
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Síndrome neuroléptico maligno
Vincent M. Vacca,Danielle Toland
Nursing (Ed. española). 2014; 31(2): 15
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Neuroleptic malignant syndrome
Vincent M. Vacca,Danielle Toland
Nursing. 2013; 43(5): 22
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
<
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Case Report
  Discussion
   Recommendations ...
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2625    
    Printed129    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded461    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal