An Official publication of The Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons (AsianCNS)

Search Article
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Advertise Subscribe Contacts Login  Facebook Tweeter
  Users Online: 431 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 46

An outcome measure of functionality and pain in patients with low back disorder: A validation study of the Iranian version of Core Outcome Measures Index


1 Department of Neurosurgery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Mental Health, Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research, ACECR, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence Address:
Parisa Azimi
Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Functional Neurosurgery Research Center of Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1793-5482.151511

Rights and Permissions

Background: Lumbar Disc Herniation (LDH) and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) are the most common diagnoses of low back and leg pain symptoms. This study aimed to cross-culturally translate, and validate the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in Iran. Methods: The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original questionnaire were performed in accordance with published guidelines. A total of 121 patients with LDH or LSS were asked to respond to the questionnaire at two points in time: Pre and postoperative assessments (6 months follow-up). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) also was completed. To test the reliability, the internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and validity was assessed using convergent validity. Responsiveness to change also was assessed for comparing patients' pre and postoperative scores. Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the COMI at pre and postoperative assessments ranged from 0.79 to 0.82, indicating a good internal consistency. The change in the ODI after surgery was strongly correlated with change in the COMI, lending support to its good convergent validity (r = 0.79 for LDH and r = 0.77 for LSS; P < 0.001). In addition, the correlation of each item with its hypothesized subscale of the COMI showed satisfactory results suggesting, that the items had a substantial association with the subscale, representing the concept. Further analysis also indicated that the questionnaire was responsive to change (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: The Iranian version of COMI performed well, and the findings suggest that it is a reliable and valid measure of back pain treatment evaluation among LDH and lumbar canal stenosis patients.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1294    
    Printed22    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded165    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal