|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 94-97
Combination of needle aspiration and core needle biopsy: A new technique of stereotactic biopsy
Abrar Ahad Wani1, M Afzal Wani1, Altaf U Ramzan1, Furqan A Nizami1, Nayil K Malik1, S Shafiq1, Rais Ahmad2, Ashish Kumar1, Iqbal Lone2, Rumana Makhdoomi2
1 Department of Neurosurgery, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
2 Department of Pathology, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
|Date of Web Publication||1-Mar-2016|
Dr. Abrar Ahad Wani
Department of Neurosurgery, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, PO Bag 27, Soura, Srinagar - 190 011, Jammu and Kashmir
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Aim: The study aims at describing the results of using a new technique to acquire the tissue sample in stereotactic biopsy of brain lesions.
Materials and Methods: The study was performed in 19 patients over a period of 5 years in which we used the new technique, i.e., Abrar and Afzal technique (AT) of obtaining tissue biopsy. It is a combination of core tissue biopsy and needle aspiration techniques. The technique was devised to acquire greater amount of tissue for pathologic study.
Results: While we could give pathologic diagnosis in 18 patients out of 19 (94.7%), in one patient, the tissue sample revealed only inflammatory cells and definitive diagnosis could not be reached. There was no significant morbidity or any mortality in the series.
Conclusion: Abrar and Afzal technique is a reasonably accurate technique of acquiring larger tissue sample in stereotactic brain biopsy without any additional risks. It can be done with little modification of the conventional equipment available with the stereotactic system.
Keywords: Cerebral mass lesions, stereotaxy, technical modification
|How to cite this article:|
Wani AA, Wani M A, Ramzan AU, Nizami FA, Malik NK, Shafiq S, Ahmad R, Kumar A, Lone I, Makhdoomi R. Combination of needle aspiration and core needle biopsy: A new technique of stereotactic biopsy. Asian J Neurosurg 2016;11:94-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Wani AA, Wani M A, Ramzan AU, Nizami FA, Malik NK, Shafiq S, Ahmad R, Kumar A, Lone I, Makhdoomi R. Combination of needle aspiration and core needle biopsy: A new technique of stereotactic biopsy. Asian J Neurosurg [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Jul 11];11:94-7. Available from: http://www.asianjns.org/text.asp?2016/11/2/94/145188
| Introduction|| |
Evolution of more sophisticated imaging techniques has initiated a renewed interest in stereotactic devices, methods, and application. True stereotaxy means precise guidance of various instruments to a preselected discrete target with accuracy and precision,, and its major use remains in biopsies of cerebral mass lesions for the purpose of pathological diagnosis.
Stereotactic frames have gained acceptance and have become a safe and invaluable tool for deep tumor biopsies., Computed tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging MRI-directed stereotactic brachytherapy,, cyst and abscess drainage,, intracranial hematoma evacuation,,, intracranial tissue transplantation, and linear accelerator treatments.,
More recently, complex frameless stereotactic systems, with various software algorithms and usually using fiducial scalp markers, which provide at least the same level of accuracy as the frame-based methods are used., Sophisticated stereotactic instrumentation has been developed by Kelly et al., In our center, we are using the Leksell frame for our stereotactic procedures. We describe our experience with this frame by using the technical modification in taking biopsy which is a combination of needle aspiration and core needle biopsy.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The patients included in the study were all adults. The patients with diagnosis of having lesions located in a deep location or multiple lesions or diffuse lesions whose diagnosis could not be made after all radiological investigations were included.
Stereotactic biopsy (STB) is performed under local anesthesia (2% xylocaine) in all of the admitted patients (n = 19) and in seven patients, we had to use propofol sedation as well. STB was performed using the standard frontal bur hole (n = 16) and bur holes were tailor-made in three patients who had relatively superficial lesions in posterior parietal and occipital lobes. In these cases, the entry point was chosen after taking into consideration the neurological functions of the area involved and vascular structures in the area.
The frame used in our study is the Leksell's frame which was fixed using a local anesthetic agent at the pin site. The patients were then shifted to the CT scan room. Imaging system used by us was 64 slice, Siemens Somatom Sensation (Siemen, Enlargen, Germany). Initially, a single slice of CT scan was taken at approximately midway of the frame to ensure proper alignment of the frame with the axis of the CT gantry. Once the position was verified, an ionic contrast (Iohexol) 50 mL was administered intravenously and then imaging was done. Once scanning was done, the coordinates were calculated along x, y, and z axis. [Figure 1] All the patients had undergone CT scan (contrast-enhanced) prior to intervention. Besides, 16 patients had MRI done as well. The patients had a small bur hole (10 mm) made and arc of the device was locked in the frame. The frame was set as per the co-ordinates along the three axis.
|Figure 1: Computed tomography scan showing the target with fiducial markers and coordinates along x, y, z axis|
Click here to view
Using AT, we chose the target as most enhancing portion of lesion which is on the superficial aspect of tumor. The cannula we used is a modified cannula which is 0.9-mm cannula and was provided with the Leksell stereotactic equipment. On this we mount, a rubber conduit cut from the intravenous infusion drip set, a 5-mL syringe can be attached to the other side of rubber conduit [Figure 2]. We introduced the cannula with stylet inside to the target (T) as seen in [Figure 3], then we removed the stylet and introduced the cannula within the lesion for further 2 cm (lesser for lesions <2 cm) with negative suction being applied by a 5-mL syringe at the base of the cannula. Then, negative suction was removed and the cannula was withdrawn without re-inserting the stylet. The cannula was flushed with saline and the contents collected into a vial. The sample was in form of a long strip of tissue unlike the small bits obtained by conventional cup forceps. Crush biopsy or frozen section biopsy was done and once diagnosis was confirmed, the frame was removed and scalp incision closed. In the cases of biopsy being negative in first pass we take another pass from a different target and do repeat crush biopsy (n = 3). However, in one case we could not reach the final conclusion despite 2 passes and hitting the target correctly (as revealed by post-procedure CT scan). A specimen is sent for definitive biopsy as well.
|Figure 2: The cannula used for obtaining the tissue in stereotactic biopsy, rubber conduit is attached to the superficial part of cannula, to which we attach the syringe after removing of stylet once target is entered|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Schematic representation of contrast-enhancing target (t) inside the lesion. B represents the site of entry burr bole. N represents the necrotic portion of tumor and L is trajectory line|
Click here to view
| Results|| |
We enrolled the adult patients with age ranging from 21 years to 65 years. Male female ratio was 2:1. The site of lesion was frontal in three, parietal and occipital in two, basal ganglia in four, corpus callosum in one, thalamic in six, pineal in one, and two in sellar an suprasellar region [Table 1].
The pathological diagnosis was confirmed in 18 cases and in one case no conclusion was drawn. The nature of the lesion included glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in three, grade II, III astrocytomas in three, pineal tumor in one, ependymomas in two, melanoma in one, tuberculoma in two, inflammatory in one, craniophrangiomas in one, and lymphomas in five [Table 2]. In the case where biopsy was not confirmatory, we could only see an inflammatory infiltrate.
| Discussion|| |
The goal of any STB technique is obtaining tissue diagnosis with accuracy and least morbidity. During the past few decades, neurosurgery has seen the evolution of increasingly sophisticated imaging devices that allow unusual refinements in the radiological appreciation of normal and abnormal intracranial structures. Many stereotactic devices that allow a wedding of imaging techniques and stereotactic neurosurgical concepts have become available., Krieger et al. had an accuracy of 95% in their study on brain tumors. Dammers had accuracy of 89.4% in their study. The extensive study by Apuzzo et al. analyzed 500 patients in whom they performed STB and they had an accuracy of 95.6% and they had a mortality of 1%. Fugen et al. compared the results of STB and resected surgical specimens in brain lesions in a small study group and they could achieve 94% results.
The sophisticated stereotactic instrumentation has been developed by Kelly et al.,, combining the microscope, laser, and computer stimulation for image-directed tumor excisions. Stereotactic and functional neurosurgeons have relied upon the consistent accuracy of probe and electrode placements affordable by skull-fixed coordinate frames since the development of stereoencephalotome in 1947. Our technical modification is that of taking tissue sample using the Leksell stereotactic frame system.
The idea of taking core biopsy occurred while analyzing the literature comparing core breast biopsy with minimal biopsy and fine needle aspiration cytology which revealed far better results of the core biopsy. Another factor was the incidence of negative biopsies with conventional techniques of taking tissue biopsy with cup forceps when the pathologist would often report inadequate sample. In our technique, we achieve a combined effect of aspiration due to negative suction of syringe with the cutting effect of passing core needle through the tumor.
Advance in technology and the development of computers and digital techniques in the recent years have led to increasing use of complex systems, with various software to process imaging data and facilitate accurate intra-operative localization of intracranial lesions without the use of stereotactic frame systems., But in most of the undeveloped countries, the frameless stereotactic systems are not available in every neurosurgical center and the modifications with the frame-based systems can get comparable results.
Out of 19 patients in our study, we found that the precision of our system that has been described that allows the exact localization of lesions (18 out of 19) and the biopsies can be performed with a single pass of the aspiration needle. Obviously, such a method is superior to the conventional methods of STB and also “freehand” biopsies performed with the patients positioned in the CT scanner, which rely on serial scans for guidance as the biopsy needle is advanced. Moreover, the surgical procedure can be performed without loss of accuracy in a more convenient and sterile way by our system.
Most of our use of CT-stereotaxy is directed toward biopsy of brain lesions such as deep intrinsic masses 3.5 cm or less in diameter; small superficial lesions otherwise difficult to localize and lesions associated with motor, visual, or speech areas.
Advantages of AT over CT are that only single pass of biopsy needle is required through normal brain and the tissue yield is superior to CT. A single tissue specimen contains tissue from the enhancing and non-enhancing portion of the tissue which is not possible with the CT.
| Conclusion|| |
Abrar and Afzal technique is an acceptable method of stereotactic brain biopsy and can be done without additional risks with higher tissue yield. It can be done with little modification of the conventional equipment available with the stereotactic system.
| Acknowledgments|| |
I am thankful to my teachers Prof. Sanjay Behari and Prof. RV Phadke who taught me the stereotactic procedures and have been a source of inspiration for the same.
| References|| |
Blaauw G, Braakman R. Pitfalls in diagnostic stereotactic brain surgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1988;42:161-5.
Dorward NL, Alberti O, Palmer JD, Kitchen ND, Thomas DG. Accuracy of true frameless stereotaxy:In vivo
measurement and laboratory phantom studies. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1999;90:160-8.
Drake JM, Rutka JT, Hoffman HJ. ISG viewing wand system. Neurosurgery 1994;34:1094-7.
Apuzzo ML, Chandrasoma PT, Cohen D, Zee CS, Zelman V. Computed imaging stereotaxy: Experience and perspective related to 500 procedures applied to brain masses. Neurosurgery 1987;20:930-7.
Kelly PJ. Stereotactic biopsy procedures. In: Tumor Stereotaxis. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.; 1992. p. 183-222.
Lunsford LD, Coffey RJ, Cojocaru T, Leksell D. Image-guided stereotactic surgery: A 10-year evolutionary experience. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1990;54-55:375-87.
Rivas JJ, Lobato RD. CT-assisted stereotaxic aspiration of colloid cysts of the third ventricle. J Neurosurg 1985;62:238-42.
Backlund EO, von Holst H. Controlled subtotal evacuation of intracerebral haematomas by stereotactic technique. Surg Neurol 1978;9:99-101.
Higgins AC, Nashold BS Jr. Modification of instrument for stereotactic evacuation of intracerebral hematoma: Technical note. Neurosurgery 1980;7:604-5.
Colombo F, Benedetti A, Pozza F, Zanardo A, Avanzo RC, Chierego G, et al
. Stereotactic radiosurgery utilizing a linear accelerator. Appl Neurophysiol 1985;48:133-45.
Heilbrun MP. Computed tomography-guided stereotactic systems. Clin Neurosurg 1983;31:564-81.
Barnett GH, Kormos DW, Steiner CP, Weisenberger J. Use of a frameless, armless stereotactic wand for brain tumor localization with two-dimensional and three-dimensional neuroimaging. Neurosurgery 1993;33:674-8.
Germano IM, Villalobos H, Silvers A, Post KD. Clinical use of the optical digitizer for intracranial neuronavigation. Neurosurgery 1999;45:261-9.
Kelly PJ, Kall BA, Goerss S, Earnest F
. Computer-assisted stereotaxic laser resection of intra-axial brain neoplasms. J Neurosurg 1986;64:427-39.
Fuchs M, Wischman HA, Neumann A, Weese J, Zylka W, Sabczynski J, et al
. Accuracy analysis for image-guided neurosurgery using fiducial skin markers, 3D CT imaging, and an optical localizer system. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, editors. Computer Assisted Radiology: CAR '96 – Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Communication Systems for Image-guided Diagnosis and Therapy. Paris, Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1996. p. 770-5.
Nauta HJ. Error assessment during “image guided” and “imaging interactive” stereotactic surgery. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1994;18:279-87.
Krieger MD, Chandrasoma PT, Zee CS, Apuzzo ML. Role of stereotactic biopsy in the diagnosis and management of brain tumors. Semin Surg Oncol 1998;14:13-25.
Dammers R, Haitsma IK, Schouten JW, Kros JM, Avezaat CJ, Vincent AJ. Safety and efficacy of frameless and frame-based intracranial biopsy techniques. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008;150:23-9.
Fugen V, Hakan T, Karadereler S, Erkan M. Accuracy and diagnostic yield of stereotactic biopsy in the diagnosis of brain masses: Comparison of results of biopsy and resected surgical specimens. Japanese Society of Neuropathology 2005;25:207-13.
Spiegel EA, Wycis HT, Marks M, Lee AJ. Stereotaxic apparatus for operations on the human brain. Science 1947;106:349-50.
Agarwal T, Patel B, Rajan P, Cunningham DA, Darzi A, Hadjiminas DJ. Core biopsy versus FNAC for palpable breast cancers. Is image guidance necessary? Eur J Cancer 2003;39:52-6.
Golfinos JG, Fitzpatrick BC, Smith LR, Spetzler RF. Clinical use of a frameless stereotactic arm: Results of 325 cases. J Neurosurg 1995;83:197-205.
Sandeman DR, Patel N, Chandler C, Nelson RJ, Coakham HB, Griffith HB. Advances in image-directed neurosurgery: Preliminary experience with the ISG viewing wand compared with the leksell G frame. Br J Neurosurg 1994;8:529-44.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||The diagnostic quality of needle brain biopsy specimens obtained with different sampling methods – Experimental study
| ||Piotr Trojanowski,Bozena Jarosz,Dariusz Szczepanek |
| ||Scientific Reports. 2019; 9(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||“Two is not enough” – Impact of the number of tissue samples obtained from stereotactic brain biopsies in suspected glioblastoma
| ||Johanna Quick-Weller,Julia Tichy,Patrick N. Harter,Stephanie Tritt,Peter Baumgarten,Oliver Bähr,Nazife Dinc,Bedjan Behmanesh,Lutz Weise,Volker Seifert,Gerhard Marquardt |
| ||Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2017; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|