|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 1084-1086
Epidemiology of spinal injury in North East India: A retrospective study
Gyani Jail Singh Birua1, Vishnu Singh Munda2, Nagendra Nath Murmu2
1 Department of Neurosurgery, SMIMS and CRH, Gangtok, Sikkim, India
2 Department of General Surgery, SMIMS and CRH, Gangtok, Sikkim, India
|Date of Web Publication||23-Oct-2018|
Dr. Gyani Jail Singh Birua
Flat No 102, Staff Quarter, SMIMS, CRH, 5th Mile Tadong, Gangtok - 737 102, Sikkim
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Aim: To find out the epidemiology of spinal injury in North East India. Material and Methods: This study is a retrospective hospital-based analysis of spine injury patients admitted to Central Referral Hospital, Sikkim Manipal University from July 2013 to June 2017July 2013 to June 2017. Results: During the study period 57 patients with spinal injury were admitted and treated. Out of the 57 patients, 46 (81%) were male and 11 (19%) were female. The most common mode of injury was fall from height (59.64%) followed by RTA (35.08%). Most common affected age group in this study was 20-39 years followed by 50-59 years age group. Cervical spine injury was the most common (52.63%) followed by thoracic (19.29%) spine. Most common injury found was fracture dislocation of C5-C6 level. Most common associated injury is head trauma (10.52 %) followed by chest injury and 82.45% cases had no associated trauma. Average period of hospital stay was 22.83 days with maximum period of stay was 111 days. During treatment period one patient died due to respiratory complications. Conclusion: The epidemiology of spinal injuries in Sikkim & North Eastern India is different from rest of the India and other developing countries. In present study most common cause of spine injury was fall from height followed by motor vehicle accidents. RTA was the main cause in younger age group and fall from height was more common in elderly group.
Keywords: Epidemiology, North East India, spinal injury
|How to cite this article:|
Birua GJ, Munda VS, Murmu NN. Epidemiology of spinal injury in North East India: A retrospective study. Asian J Neurosurg 2018;13:1084-6
| Introduction|| |
Traumatic spinal injury (TSI, injury to spinal column, spinal cord, or both) commonly leads to significant impairment in the quality of life. More than 10% of trauma patients sustain spinal injury and they have a higher mortality rate compared to other traumas., The incidence of spinal fractures is reported to vary between 16 and 64/100,000 depending on the study area and population concerned., Internationally, most of the injuries are caused by road traffic accidents (RTAs), together with low and high falls. Road traffic and high fall accidents are typical etiology in young patients, whereas the role of low falls and associated osteoporosis increases trauma in older population. Spinal fractures are often associated with other injuries as 30% to 55% of patients are reported to have at least one associated injury., Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the severe consequences coexisting in one-tenth to one-fifth of those with spinal injury., Epidemiological factors of SCI in Indian scenario are different from Western countries, with the major cause being fall. The low socioeconomic status and younger age group have a major financial, social, and psychological impact as majority of the patients are the primary earning members of the family.
In the Indian setup, as in most developing countries, very little is known about the exact incidence of SCIs. Since there is no curative treatment for SCI, prevention of SCI is paramount. Investigating the epidemiological pattern of SCI is the first step in planning for preventive strategies.
Northeastern state of India, Sikkim, is a state in Himalayan region; hence, majority of population lives in hills. It is crisscrossed by narrow valley and steep cliff. It has a fragile ecology being one of the steepest and the highest states in India. The state also experiences heavy monsoons. These geographical factors play a crucial role in incidence, prevalence, mortality, and morbidity of TSI patients in this part of the country. Moreover, this part of the country has very less number of tertiary level health-care facilities.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This study is a retrospective, hospital-based analysis of spine injury patients. The study sample included patients with TSI admitted to the Central Referral Hospital, Sikkim Manipal University, from July 2013 to June 2017. Patient records collected from the Medical Record Department included all inpatient and outpatient visits and surgical procedures. Permission from Ethics Committee of Sikkim Manipal University was taken. Online literature search was undertaken in PubMed library with the keywords “SCI, epidemiology, mechanism of injury.” Journals with significant epidemiological information were selected. The patients admitted in other departments or institutions or those who expired before reaching the department were excluded from this study. Data are presented as number (%) or ratio.
| Results and Observation|| |
In the present study, the most common cause of spine injury was fall from height [Table 1] and [Table 2] including hills, roof, trees, electricity pole, and stairs (59.64%) followed by motor vehicle accidents (35.08%), which is comparable to other case series of India.
The most common affected age group in this study was 20–39 years followed by 50–59 years. In [Figure 1], it can be seen that 56.14% (n = 32) patients come under the 20–39 years' age group, signifying higher incidence in young, active, and productive population of the society. Injury in 50–59 years' age group (26.32%, n = 15) was mostly due to fall.
Like other studies of India [Table 3] and [Figure 2], male sex is more prone to SCI.,,,, Higher incidence in males can be explained by examination of etiological factors, with men being more exposed to risk factors since they are more active on account of occupations. Furthermore, this is probably due to household stay of females.
Cervical injuries were the most common spinal injuries with 52.63% (n = 30). No sacral injuries were found. Most common injuries found were fracture dislocations of C5–C6 level. There was no case of SCIWORA in the study.
SCI was found in 91.22% (n = 52) of spinal injury patients. On the basis of American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading, severe neurological injuries (ASIA B and higher) were found in 48.07% (n = 25) of patients.
In 82.45% (n = 47) cases, no associated injury was identified. The most common associated injury was head injury (10.52%) followed by chest injury.
Seasonal distribution of SCI showed a marked increase during summer, followed by rainy season signifying increased movement of people in this season.
The average time of transportation of patients was 15.35 h. During transportation, >90% of patients were not accompanied by trained personnel, who were supposed to know how to handle patients with SCI. Less than 15% (n = 8) of patients were found to be transported with cervical immobilizer in situ.
The average period of hospital stay was 22.83 days, with the maximum period of stay being 111 days. During the treatment period, one patient died due to respiratory complications.
| Conclusion|| |
SCI has a major effect not only on individual but also on family and society by psychological and economical manner. Most of the studies in medical literatures are from developed nations, whose epidemiological data are different. Developing countries like India should have a proper national system of SCI reporting, which will be helpful in identifying risk factors, various epidemiological factors, their preventive measures, and rehabilitation. Public should also be educated and trained about SCI and importations of early and proper transportation of SCI patients. Incidence of RTAs can be decreased by implementing strict traffic rules; moreover, in the present study, alcohol was one of the most important causes of RTA and drink and drive has to be banned strictly.
Age group 50–59 years [Figure 1] is particularly vulnerable to fall from stairs, roof, bed, etc. Like other developing countries, India does not have national level policy for care of old-age people. Unlike other parts of the country, the northeast part of India does not have spinal rehabilitation centers, which also increases the morbidity of SCI patients. Although this study is restricted to one institution only, it may not be the true representation of epidemiology of this part of the country. However, it can be taken as a trend, as Sikkim is geographically similar to other northeastern states of India.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Bouyer B, Vassal M, Zairi F, Dhenin A, Grelat M, Dubory A, et al.
Surgery in vertebral fracture: Epidemiology and functional and radiological results in a prospective series of 518 patients at 1 year's follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015;101:11-5.
Akmal M, Trivedi R, Sutcliffe J. Functional outcome in trauma patients with spinal injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:180-5.
Hasler RM, Exadaktylos AK, Bouamra O, Benneker LM, Clancy M, Sieber R, et al.
Epidemiology and predictors of spinal injury in adult major trauma patients: European cohort study. Eur Spine J 2011;20:2174-80.
Moradi-Lakeh M, Rasouli MR, Vaccaro AR, Saadat S, Zarei MR, Rahimi-Movaghar V, et al.
Burden of traumatic spine fractures in Tehran, Iran. BMC Public Health 2011;11:789.
Hu R, Mustard CA, Burns C. Epidemiology of incident spinal fracture in a complete population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:492-9.
Wang H, Zhang Y, Xiang Q, Wang X, Li C, Xiong H, et al.
Epidemiology of traumatic spinal fractures: Experience from medical university-affiliated hospitals in Chongqing, China, 2001-2010. J Neurosurg Spine 2012;17:459-68.
Leucht P, Fischer K, Muhr G, Mueller EJ. Epidemiology of traumatic spine fractures. Injury 2009;40:166-72.
Oliver M, Inaba K, Tang A, Branco BC, Barmparas G, Schnüriger B, et al.
The changing epidemiology of spinal trauma: A 13-year review from a level I trauma centre. Injury 2012;43:1296-300.
Fletcher DJ, Taddonio RF, Byrne DW, Wexler LM, Cayten CG, Nealon SM, et al.
Incidence of acute care complications in vertebral column fracture patients with and without spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:1136-46.
Mathur N, Jain S, Kumar N, Srivastava A, Purohit N, Patni A, et al.
Spinal cord injury: Scenario in an Indian state. Spinal Cord 2015;53:349-52.
McCammon JR, Ethans K. Spinal cord injury in Manitoba: A provincial epidemiological study. J Spinal Cord Med 2011;34:6-10.
Chacko V, Joseph B, Mohanty SP, Jacob T. Management of spinal cord injury in a general hospital in rural India. Paraplegia 1986;24:330-5.
Lan C, Lai JS, Chang KH, Jean YC, Lien IN. Traumatic spinal cord injuries in the rural region of Taiwan: An epidemiological study in Hualien county, 1986-1990. Paraplegia 1993;31:398-403.
Shingu H, Ikata T, Katoh S, Akatsu T. Spinal cord injuries in Japan: A nationwide epidemiological survey in 1990. Paraplegia 1994;32:3-8.
Chen D, Apple DF Jr., Hudson LM, Bode R. Medical complications during acute rehabilitation following spinal cord injury – Current experience of the model systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1397-401.
Karacan I, Koyuncu H, Pekel O, Sümbüloglu G, Kirnap M, Dursun H, et al.
Traumatic spinal cord injuries in turkey: A nation-wide epidemiological study. Spinal Cord 2000;38:697-701.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Evaluating Bone Loss with Bone Turnover Markers Following Acute Spinal Cord Injury
| ||Prince Thakkar,Naveen B. Prakash,George Tharion,Sahana Shetty,Thomas V. Paul,Joseph Bondu,Bijesh Yadav |
| ||Asian Spine Journal. 2020; 14(1): 97 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Frequency, characteristics and hospital outcomes of road traffic accidents and their victims in Guinea: a three-year retrospective study from 2015 to 2017
| ||Karifa Kourouma,Alexandre Delamou,Léopold Lamah,Bienvenu Salim Camara,Delphin Kolie,Sidikiba Sidibé,Abdoul Habib Béavogui,Philip Owiti,Marcel Manzi,Serge Ade,Anthony D. Harries |
| ||BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|