An Official publication of The Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons (AsianCNS)

Search Article
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Advertise Subscribe Contacts Login  Facebook Tweeter
  Users Online: 1357 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 1101-1107

Spinal cord-derived neural precursor cells as a preventive therapy for spinal cord injury


1 Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences; Cell and Molecular Medicine Student Research Group, Medical Faculty, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences; Department of Anatomy, Stem Cell Laboratory, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2 Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences; Cell and Molecular Medicine Student Research Group, Medical Faculty, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Date of Web Publication23-Oct-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini
Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences; Cell and Molecular Medicine Student Research Group, Medical Faculty, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences; Department of Anatomy, Stem Cell Laboratory, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_140_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) as one of the most important diseases of central nervous system (CNS) without any definite treatment is still growing in incidence. In addition to trauma, some surgeries such as cardiac and thoracic aorta surgery may result in SCI as a complication. In last years, a promising approach has shed light on this CNS injury thanks to stem cell technology. Stem cell therapy could be considered as a good candidate for transplantation and enhancing neural regeneration in SCI. In this study, we identified the effects of spinal cord-derived neural precursor cells (NPCs) transplantation on SCI in after and before injury injection. Materials and Methods: NPCs were isolated from the adult rat spinal cord and cultured in vitro using complete culture media. After neurosphere formation, the cells were differentiated to neurons, oligodendrocytes, and astrocyte. The cells were transplanted to the rat model of SCI in 1 day before and 1 day after injury. The animals were followed for 12 weeks to assess their neurological performance. In addition, histological study and inflammatory cytokines levels have been studied. Results: Our results indicate that NPCs infusion both pre- and post-SCI could decrease the level of inflammatory cytokines. In addition, the neurological performance and histologic studies showed recovery after this type of injury using NPCs, and it might be due to inflammation modulatory effects on neural stem cells. Conclusion: NPCs therapy for SCI in both two-time points (before and after SCI) could be beneficial and make a neurological recovery. In other words, NPCs therapy could be considered as a therapeutic and also preventive approach for SCI.

Keywords: Apoptosis, inflammation, neural precursor cells, protective, spinal cord injury


How to cite this article:
Hosseini SM, Sharafkhah A, Ziaee SM. Spinal cord-derived neural precursor cells as a preventive therapy for spinal cord injury. Asian J Neurosurg 2018;13:1101-7

How to cite this URL:
Hosseini SM, Sharafkhah A, Ziaee SM. Spinal cord-derived neural precursor cells as a preventive therapy for spinal cord injury. Asian J Neurosurg [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 18];13:1101-7. Available from: http://www.asianjns.org/text.asp?2018/13/4/1101/231004




  Introduction Top


Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a serious neurologic problem with annual incidence of 15–40 cases per million worldwide,[1] and has devastating consequences including various degrees of neurological problems (such as loss of sensory and motor function, bowel and bladder dysfunction, spasticity, neuropathic pain, and autonomic dysreflexia), increased rates of cardiovascular problems, deep vein thrombosis, osteoporosis, and bed sores.[2],[3],[4],[5] The combination of these problems can greatly impact one's functional ability and thus the general quality of life, emphasizing the need for developing treatment strategies for SCI. In some medical conditions, SCI could happen as a complication of thoracic aorta surgery and also cardiac surgery.[6],[7] Almost 16% of the patients that undergo thoracic surgery may face with cord injury mostly due to ischemic phenomena.[8]

In the view of pathophysiology, two sets of events cause SCI; a primary damage to the spinal cord as a direct result of trauma, and a secondary injury due to initiation of reactive processes including inflammation, ischemia, lipid peroxidation, free radical production, demyelination, glial scar formation, and apoptosis and necrosis in the spinal cord tissue.[9] Various treatment strategies have been proposed regarding these pathophysiologic features. A group of studies have focused on neuroprotection by undertaking strategies to control and limit the mechanisms involved in secondary damage during the acute phase of injury.[10],[11],[12] In addition, axonal regeneration and replacement of lost neurons through growth-promoting factors and cell therapy are another approachs that have been widely considered.[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19]

Different types of cells from various sources have been used for cell therapy purposes in SCI including stem/progenitor cells (embryonic stem cells, neural stem/progenitor cells, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, etc.), and nonstem cells (olfactory ensheathing cells, Schwann cells, etc.).[20] Stem cells have shown promising results in multiple studies performed on SCI models and are currently being tested in many laboratories.[13],[14],[15],[16],[17] Embryonic stem cells though, raise questions when it comes to the clinical application due to the ethical issues accompanied using them and also their tumorigenesis feature.[21],[22] Furthermore, employing mesenchymal stem cells have some benefits by considering their potency and ability to migrate to the injury site.[23]

Neural precursor cells (NPCs) could generate the three major cell type: neurons, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes; and their use also does not raise concern known with use of embryonic stem cells.[15] In addition, studies employing NPCs in primate, canine and rodent models of acute, subacute, and chronic SCI, resulted in the neurological promising outcome.[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30] These cells are considered to have roles in both neuroprotection (through immune-modulation and angiogenesis mechanisms), axonal regeneration, and remyelination.[17] Taken together, NPCs have shown promise for cell therapy of SCI and many studies are considering the for clinical uses.

In this study, we have planned to identify the effects of systemic administration of neural precursor cell on SCI in two-time points. Neural stem cells therapy has good records to be a good candidate for treating spinal cord injuries; however, its usage before SCI has not been reported yet. We have decided to investigate if neural stem cells therapy could be an appropriate choice for preventive therapy of SCI in the conditions that may damage the spinal cord in some kinds of surgery.


  Materials and Methods Top


All experiments were approved by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Ethical Committee. All animals had free access to water and food during the experiment.

Experimental design

Sixty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were selected and divided randomly into four groups (n = 15) as below:

Control group: Received no surgical intervention and no cell therapy

Sham group: Underwent SCI surgery

NPCs before SCI: Received 1000000 neural stem cells 1 day before SCI through tail vein

NPCs after SCI: Received 1000000 neural stem cells 1 day after SCI through tail vein

Neural precursor cell isolation, expansion, and characterization

Neural precursor cells were obtained from the adult rat spinal cord. Briefly, a 250 g adult male Sprague-Dawley rat was sacrificed, and the vertebral column was removed. The spinal cord was dissected and minced. Then, hyaluronidase (Sigma cat number: H1115000) (130 λ), trypsin (Gibco cat number: 25300054) (130 λ), and DNase I (Roch cat number: 04536282001) (25 λ) were added, the tissue was kept for 30 min in 37 ° C water bath with every 10 min shaking. For next step, the dissociated tissue was passed through 40 μm cell strainer, and then centrifuged for 5 min at 350 g. The isolated cells were transferred to T-25 cell culture flask with 5 ml complete neural precursor cells culture media containing DMEM/F12 (Gibco cat number: 10565018), 10 ng/ml bFGF (Sigma cat number: F3685), 20 ng/ml EGF (Sigma cat number: E9644), 2% B27 (Gibco cat number: 17504044), and 1% Pen/Strep (Gibco cat number: 15140122).

For differentiation of neural stem cells to tri-neural lineages cells, 5% fetal bovine serum (Gibco cat number: 26140079) was added to the culture media for 48 h. To detect neuron, astrocyte, and oligodendrocyte which were differentiated from neural precursor cells, immunostaining was done for microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP-2), anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and CNPase, respectively. For immunocytochemistry, the cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde 4% in + 4°C for 20 min. Following, permeabilization and blocking were performed with Triton 0.01% and goat serum 10%. After fixation, the cells were washed with phosphate-bufferred solution (PBS), and primary antibody for MAP-2 (Abcam ab32454, 1:500), GFAP (Dako Z0334, 1:1000), and CNPase (Abcam ab6319 1:500) were added, the cells were kept in room temperature for 2 h. Following incubation for primary antibody, the cells were washed with PBS, and the secondary antibodies were added and the cells incubated for 1 h in room temperature once again.

Spinal cord injury modeling

Compression model of SCI has been used in this study. Briefly, rats were anesthetized with halothane 2% and mixture of 1:1 N2 and O2. A midline incision was made from T5 to T9 vertebral column after using betadine as disinfectant. For reaching to spinal cord, the laminectomy was performed between T6 and T8, and spinal cord was compressed at the level of T7 by a 23 g aneurysm clip for 1 min. After compression, the wound was sutured and the rats received postoperation care.[31]

Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan open-field locomotion scoring

For evaluation the motor performance of the rats, the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) scoring was performed twice a week for 12 weeks by blinded examiner for each rat. The 22 BBB score (0–21) was used to assess the hindlimb locomotors recovery containing joint movement, stepping ability, trunk stability, and coordination. The score 21 represent no impairment which is in uninjured rats.[32]

Histology study

For evaluation necrosis and damaged area due to SCI, the cryosections of the damaged area were prepared and stained with H and E. The necrotic area was known due to existing some signs such as cells with swelling, pyknosis, and karyorrhexis nucleus, and disrupted cell membrane. For assessing the damage quantitatively, the sections were scored by blinded reviewer experts in this field from 0 to 3 by existing and intensity of inflammatory cell infiltration, neuronal vacuolation, and hemorrhage (0 is no evidence and 3 is sever).[33]

Apoptosis evaluation by assessment of caspase 3 activity

Activation of ICE-family proteases/caspases initiates apoptosis in cells. This assay is based on a spectrophotometric evaluation of chromophore p-nitroaniline (p-NA) after cleavage from labeled substrate (Asp-Glu-Val-Asp-Gly)DEVD-p-NA. The p-NA light emission could be measured using spectrophotometer at 400–405 nm. The activation of Caspase 3 was assessed 10 days after SCI. For this assessment, Caspase 3 assay kit from Abcam Company was used (Abcam Company, UK cat number: ab39401).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Concentration of interleukin 1 (IL-1) β and IL-6 and in spinal cord (site of injury) were evaluated using IL-1 β (Abcam UK ab100768) and IL-6 (Abcam UK 100713). The levels of these proinflammatory cytokines were measured 5 days after SCI model.

Statistical analysis

All data reported as mean ± standard deviation in this study, and they were analyzed with one-way ANOVA test with Prism Graph pad 6.00. The statistically significant difference was set at P < 0.05.


  Results Top


Neural precursor cells expansion, differentiation and characterization

The cultured neural precursor cells formed a sphere such as cell gathering which called neurosphere after 5 days. These isolated neural stem cells differentiated to three neural lineages by adding 5% fetal bovine serum to their culture media, they produce different cell types based on morphology feature. One of the most important characters for neural stem cells is capability of this cell type for differentiating to tri-lineages. They could differentiate to neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes which were stained with MAP-2, GFAP, and CNPase antibodies, respectively [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Differentiation of neural stem cells in three lineages. Differentiation of neural stem cells to neurons and immunocytochemistry with anti-microtubule-associated protein two antibodies (a-c). Neural stem cells could be differentiated to oligodendrocyte which is stained with the anti-CNPase antibody (d-f). Astrocyte differentiation of neural stem cells staining with anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein antibody

Click here to view


Locomotor function assessment by Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan scores

The rats were examined twice a week by a blinded reviewer for 12 weeks to evaluate their motor function recovery. The neurological scores for sham group was (7.88 ± 0.91), for group that received cell therapy before SCI was (11.26 ± 2.70) and for group that received cell therapy after SCI was (11.27 ± 2.32). Both groups which received neural stem cells had better neurological outcome and there was significant difference between them and sham group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between group that received neural stem cells before SCI and group which received neural stem cells after SCI. This data show that cell therapy by neural stem cells whether pre- and post-injury could enhance neurological outcome [Figure 2] and [Table 1].
Figure 2: Neural examination during 12-week posttransplantation which shows functional improvement in groups with cell therapy treatment (a). Histologically, assessment of spinal cord tissue shows more recovery in cell therapy groups (b)

Click here to view
Table 1: Total characterization for different groups

Click here to view


Histology study

The histological study has been performed based on the quantitative scoring as previously described. The histological score for sham group was (2.40 ± 0.21), for preinjury-treated group was (1.19 ± 0.27) and for postinjury-treated group was (1.83 ± 0.22). The quantitative score of histological study showed that both groups which received neural stem cells before and after SCI had lower histological damage in comparison with sham group (P < 0.05). Interestingly, the group that received NPCs before SCI showed better histological outcome in comparison with the group with postinjury cell therapy (P < 0.05).

This result indicates that neural progenitor cells transplantation could diminish in situ damage of the SCI, especially when the cells were injected before SCI [Figure 2] and [Table 1].

Caspase 3 activity assessment for determining apoptosis

The apoptosis was evaluated 10 days after SCI by detecting activation of caspase 3.

The more caspase 3 activity represents more apoptosis. Absorbance at 405 nm, as an index for caspase 3 activity was (1.11 ± 0.07) in the sham group, (0.56 ± 0.04) in the group that received cell therapy before SCI and (0.77 ± 0.05) in the group that received postinjury cell therapy. The data indicate that all cell therapy groups have less apoptosis rate than sham group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, there is a significant difference (P < 0.05) between different time points of cell therapy, and the group with cell therapy before injury showed less activity of caspase 3 [Figure 3] and [Table 1].
Figure 3: Caspase 3 activity quantification for apoptosis measurement that indicates lower rate of apoptosis in cell therapy received groups (a). The level of interleukin 1β and interleukin six measurements by ELISA method shows that they have been diminished in experimental groups (b and c)

Click here to view


Inflammatory cytokines quantification

As described earlier, for exploring the underlying mechanism for preventive effects of the neural stem cells administration on the spinal cord, the level of two inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and IL-6) were assessed. IL-1β level was (331 pg/ml ± 50.74) in sham group, (132 pg/ml ± 19.07) in the group that received cell therapy before SCI and (209 pg/ml ± 15.52) in group with postinjury cell therapy after injury. In addition, to IL-1β, the level of IL-6 another sign of inflammation was measured. IL-6 level was (203.66 pg/ml ± 8.02) in sham group, (134.66 pg/ml ± 14.18) in group with preinjury cell therapy, and (167.33 pg/ml ± 14.01) in postinjury cell treated group. As the data show, theses inflammation indexes were diminished by neural stem cell therapy, and there is a significant difference between sham group and cell therapy groups (P < 0.05). In two cell treated groups, cell therapy before the injury had less amount of IL-1 (P < 0.05) [Figure 3] and [Table 1].


  Discussion Top


Neural Precursor Cells are able to produce three neural lineages in central nervous system including neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocyte. The rate of differentiation of NPCs to each of those cells is relatively dependent on their niches.[34] Due to informative reviews, the niche's effects on the differentiation of these cells could be due to the extracellular matrix, extracellular signaling, and also cell-cell interaction.[35],[36],[37],[38] By considering the effects of the cells sources on differentiation and also their fate in this study, the spinal-cord-NPCs were used for SCI. In the view of clinic result, there are numerous studies which show that neural stem cells administration could help for recovering after SCI, and also the acute phase cell therapy could help achieving better outcome,[39] so we tested whether administration of neural precursor cells before SCI has some effects such as after SCI or not. By examining the animals during the experiment, all cell therapy groups had better improvement in comparison with a sham group which means the NPCs could help recovering after SCI in both pre- and post-injury time intervals such as previous studies. Although the most important index in the clinic is functional recovery, histological changes play a central role too. For evaluating the groups from histology aspect, the samples of each group received a score as described earlier. Both cell therapy groups had lower injury scores compared to the sham group, also neural stem cell therapy before SCI was as effective as postinjury transplantation or even more. Our data showed that transplantation of NPCs for SCI could diminish tissue injury such as previous studies.[40],[41]

In our previous study, we found out transplantation of neural precursor cells for SCI could reduce apoptosis in SCI model,[42] also Hong et al. in 2014 showed that administration of neural stem cells may have anti-apoptotic effects in SCI model.[41] Following above, present study confirmed that NPCs might have anti-apoptotic effects on SCI model.

As far as researchers found about the primary and secondary damage of SCI, apoptosis plays a central part for both steps of SCI pathophysiology, and it is downstream of inflammation that caused by proinflammatory cytokines including IL1β and IL6.[43],[44],[45],[46] For finding out the underlying mechanism of anti-apoptotic effects of neural stem cells in case of SCI, we evaluated the level of the two major pro-inflammatory cytokines IL1β and IL6. Our result shows that the administration of neural precursor cells in pre- and post-injury could attenuate these cytokines and this mechanism could be considered to justify the anti-apoptotic effects of neural stem cells. This possible mechanism exists in both group of our study, so we explore that the injection of NPCs before SCI could help more boosting the recovery than its administration after SCI.


  Conclusion Top


SCI could be happened as a complication of some thoracic related surgery, so some patients have to take the risk of this kind of injury by undergoing the surgery of aneurysms of abdominal aorta or cardiac surgeries.[7],[8] According to all above and by identifying the same mechanism of NPCs in pre- and post-injury injection, our study shows that this type of cell therapy (administration before injury) could be a safe and effective way to protect patients against this complication of unavoidable surgeries. Furthermore, this kind of cell therapy consideration could help clinicians prevent SCI in their surgeries. What we found new is, cell therapy by NPCs before SCI works in a same way that it works after SCI or even better in reducing some cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-1β and as a result, it could attenuate apoptosis after injury.

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank Shiraz University of Medical Science research deputy and also Cell and Molecular Medicine Student Research Laboratory for financial support of this project.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Sekhon LH, Fehlings MG. Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:S2-12.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Wyndaele M, Wyndaele JJ. Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: What learns a worldwide literature survey? Spinal Cord 2006;44:523-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Tator C. Epidemiology and general characteristics of the spinal cord injured patient. In: Tator CH, Benzel E, editors. Contemporary Management of Spinal Cord Injury: From Impact to Rehabilitation. Park Ridge, IL: American Association of Neurological Surgeons; 2000. p. 15-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
One Degree of Separation: Paralysis and SCI in the United States. Short Hills, NJ: Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Spinal Cord Injury Facts and Figures at a Glance. Birmingham, AL: National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, University of Alabama; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Gharagozloo F, Larson J, Dausmann MJ, Neville RF Jr., Gomes MN. Spinal cord protection during surgical procedures on the descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta: Review of current techniques. Chest 1996;109:799-809.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Puntis JW, Green SH. Ischaemic spinal cord injury after cardiac surgery. Arch Dis Child 1985;60:517-20.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Flores J, Shiiya N, Kunihara T, Matsuzaki K, Yasuda K. Risk of spinal cord injury after operations of recurrent aneurysms of the descending aorta. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:1245-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Figley SA, Austin JW, Rowland JW, Fehlings MG. Pathophysiology of Spinal Cord Injury. The Cervical Spine. 5th ed. United States: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Tator CH, Fehlings MG. Review of the secondary injury theory of acute spinal cord trauma with emphasis on vascular mechanisms. J Neurosurg 1991;75:15-26.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Dietrich WD, Levi AD, Wang M, Green BA. Hypothermic treatment for acute spinal cord injury. Neurotherapeutics 2011;8:229-39.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Dietrich WD, Atkins CM, Bramlett HM. Protection in animal models of brain and spinal cord injury with mild to moderate hypothermia. J Neurotrauma 2009;26:301-12.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Mothe AJ, Tator CH. Review of transplantation of neural stem/progenitor cells for spinal cord injury. Int J Dev Neurosci 2013;31:701-13.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Sahni V, Kessler JA. Stem cell therapies for spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Neurol 2010;6:363-72.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Fehlings MG, Vawda R. Cellular treatments for spinal cord injury: The time is right for clinical trials. Neurotherapeutics 2011;8:704-20.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mothe AJ, Tator CH. Advances in stem cell therapy for spinal cord injury. J Clin Invest 2012;122:3824-34.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Tetzlaff W, Okon EB, Karimi-Abdolrezaee S, Hill CE, Sparling JS, Plemel JR, et al. A systematic review of cellular transplantation therapies for spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2011;28:1611-82.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Kadoya K, Tsukada S, Lu P, Coppola G, Geschwind D, Filbin MT, et al. Combined intrinsic and extrinsic neuronal mechanisms facilitate bridging axonal regeneration one year after spinal cord injury. Neuron 2009;64:165-72.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Bonner JF, Connors TM, Silverman WF, Kowalski DP, Lemay MA, Fischer I, et al. Grafted neural progenitors integrate and restore synaptic connectivity across the injured spinal cord. J Neurosci 2011;31:4675-86.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Hernández J, Torres-Espín A, Navarro X. Adult stem cell transplants for spinal cord injury repair: Current state in preclinical research. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2011;6:273-87.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Draper JS, Moore HD, Ruban LN, Gokhale PJ, Andrews PW. Culture and characterization of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 2004;13:325-36.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Draper JS, Smith K, Gokhale P, Moore HD, Maltby E, Johnson J, et al. Recurrent gain of chromosomes 17q and 12 in cultured human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2004;22:53-4.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Neuhuber B, Timothy Himes B, Shumsky JS, Gallo G, Fischer I. Axon growth and recovery of function supported by human bone marrow stromal cells in the injured spinal cord exhibit donor variations. Brain Res 2005;1035:73-85.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Iwanami A, Yamane J, Katoh H, Nakamura M, Momoshima S, Ishii H, et al. Establishment of graded spinal cord injury model in a nonhuman primate: The common marmoset. J Neurosci Res 2005;80:172-81.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Iwanami A, Kaneko S, Nakamura M, Kanemura Y, Mori H, Kobayashi S, et al. Transplantation of human neural stem cells for spinal cord injury in primates. J Neurosci Res 2005;80:182-90.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Yamane J, Nakamura M, Iwanami A, Sakaguchi M, Katoh H, Yamada M, et al. Transplantation of galectin-1-expressing human neural stem cells into the injured spinal cord of adult common marmosets. J Neurosci Res 2010;88:1394-405.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Salazar DL, Uchida N, Hamers FP, Cummings BJ, Anderson AJ. Human neural stem cells differentiate and promote locomotor recovery in an early chronic spinal cord injury NOD-scid mouse model. PLoS One 2010;5:e12272.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Hooshmand MJ, Sontag CJ, Uchida N, Tamaki S, Anderson AJ, Cummings BJ, et al. Analysis of host-mediated repair mechanisms after human CNS-stem cell transplantation for spinal cord injury: Correlation of engraftment with recovery. PLoS One 2009;4:e5871.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Cummings BJ, Uchida N, Tamaki SJ, Anderson AJ. Human neural stem cell differentiation following transplantation into spinal cord injured mice: Association with recovery of locomotor function. Neurol Res 2006;28:474-81.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Cummings BJ, Uchida N, Tamaki SJ, Salazar DL, Hooshmand M, Summers R, et al. Human neural stem cells differentiate and promote locomotor recovery in spinal cord-injured mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:14069-74.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Karimi-Abdolrezaee S, Eftekharpour E, Wang J, Morshead CM, Fehlings MG. Delayed transplantation of adult neural precursor cells promotes remyelination and functional neurological recovery after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 2006;26:3377-89.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC. A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. J Neurotrauma 1995;12:1-21.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Qiao F, Atkinson C, Kindy MS, Shunmugavel A, Morgan BP, Song H, et al. The alternative and terminal pathways of complement mediate post-traumatic spinal cord inflammation and injury. Am J Pathol 2010;177:3061-70.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Marthiens V, Kazanis I, Moss L, Long K, Ffrench-Constant C. Adhesion molecules in the stem cell niche – More than just staying in shape? J Cell Sci 2010;123:1613-22.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Mu Y, Lee SW, Gage FH. Signaling in adult neurogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2010;20:416-23.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Suh H, Deng W, Gage FH. Signaling in adult neurogenesis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2009;25:253-75.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Lathia JD, Rao MS, Mattson MP, Ffrench-Constant C. The microenvironment of the embryonic neural stem cell: Lessons from adult niches? Dev Dyn 2007;236:3267-82.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Preston M, Sherman LS. Neural stem cell niches: Roles for the hyaluronan-based extracellular matrix. Front Biosci (Schol Ed) 2011;3:1165-79.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Yousefifard M, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Nasirinezhad F, Baikpour M, Safari S, Saadat S, et al. Neural stem/progenitor cell transplantation for spinal cord injury treatment; A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience 2016;322:377-97.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Salewski RP, Mitchell RA, Shen C, Fehlings MG. Transplantation of neural stem cells clonally derived from embryonic stem cells promotes recovery after murine spinal cord injury. Stem Cells Dev 2015;24:36-50.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Hong JY, Lee SH, Lee SC, Kim JW, Kim KP, Kim SM, et al. Therapeutic potential of induced neural stem cells for spinal cord injury. J Biol Chem 2014;289:32512-25.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Hosseini SM, Sharafkhah A, Koohi-Hosseinabadi O, Semsar-Kazerooni M. Transplantation of neural stem cells cultured in alginate scaffold for spinal cord injury in rats. Asian Spine J 2016;10:611-8.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Allen AR. Surgery for experimental lesions of spinal cord equivalent to crush injury of fracture dislocation of spinal column: A preliminary report. JAMA 1911;57:878-80.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Lan WB, Lin JH, Chen XW, Wu CY, Zhong GX, Zhang LQ, et al. Overexpressing neuroglobin improves functional recovery by inhibiting neuronal apoptosis after spinal cord injury. Brain Res 2014;1562:100-8.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Lu PG, Feng H, Yuan SJ, Zhang RW, Li M, Hu R, et al. Effect of preconditioning with hyperbaric oxygen on neural cell apoptosis after spinal cord injury in rats. J Neurosurg Sci 2013;57:253-8.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Liu G, Wang X, Shao G, Liu Q. Genetically modified schwann cells producing glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor inhibit neuronal apoptosis in rat spinal cord injury. Mol Med Rep 2014;9:1305-12.  Back to cited text no. 46
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
<
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and Me...
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed303    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded43    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal