|
|
 |
| EDITORS CHOICE |
|
| Year : 2012 | Volume
: 7
| Issue : 4 | Page : 159-165 |
|
The study of flow diversion effects on aneurysm using multiple enterprise stents and two flow diverters
Masahiro Kojima1, Keiko Irie2, Toshio Fukuda2, Fumihito Arai3, Yuichi Hirose2, Makoto Negoro2
1 Department of Micro-Nano System Engineering, Nagoya University, Japan
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University, Japan
3 Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Nagoya University, Japan
| Date of Web Publication | 1-Feb-2013 |
Correspondence Address:
Masahiro Kojima
Department of Micro-Nano System Engineering, Nagoya University, 1 Furo-cho Chikusa-ku Nagoya Aichi 464 - 8603
Japan
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/1793-5482.106643
Background: Computer-based simulation is necessary to clarify the hemodynamics in brain aneurysm. Specifically for endovascular treatments, the effects of indwelling intravascular devices on blood stream need to be considered. The most recent technology used for cerebral aneurysm treatment is related to the use of flow diverters to reduce the amount of flow entering the aneurysm. To verify the differences of flow reduction, we analyzed multiple Enterprise stents and two kinds of flow diverters.
Materials and Methods: In this research, we virtually modeled three kinds of commercial intracranial stents (Enterprise, Silk, and Pipeline) and mounted to fit into the vessel wall, and deployed across the neck of an IC-ophthalmic artery aneurysm. Also, we compared the differences among multiple Enterprise stents and two flow diverters in a standalone mode.
Results: From the numerical results, the values of wall shear stress and pressure are reduced in proportion to the size of mesh, especially in the inflow area. However, the reduced velocity within the aneurysm sac by the multiple stents is not as significant as the flow diverters.
Conclusions: This is the first study analyzing the flow alterations among multiple Enterprise stents and flow diverters. The placement of small meshed stents dramatically reduced the aneurysmal fluid movement. However, compared to the flow diverters, we did not observe the reduction of flow velocity within the aneurysm by the multiple stents. Keywords: Aneurysm, computational fluid dynamics, flow diverter, multiple stents
How to cite this article:
Kojima M, Irie K, Fukuda T, Arai F, Hirose Y, Negoro M. The study of flow diversion effects on aneurysm using multiple enterprise stents and two flow diverters. Asian J Neurosurg 2012;7:159-65 |
How to cite this URL:
Kojima M, Irie K, Fukuda T, Arai F, Hirose Y, Negoro M. The study of flow diversion effects on aneurysm using multiple enterprise stents and two flow diverters. Asian J Neurosurg [serial online] 2012 [cited 2021 Sep 26];7:159-65. Available from: https://www.asianjns.org/text.asp?2012/7/4/159/106643 |
| Introduction | |  |
Intracranial aneurysm shown in [Figure 1] is one of the cerebral vascular diseases characterized by weakening and bulging of a portion of an artery. There are two effective approaches to treat the detected aneurysm. [1] One approach is via clipping the neck of cerebral aneurysm while the other is via undergoing intravascular surgery. The advantage of this surgery is the fact that there is no need to open the skull to expose the surface of the brain vessel. Medical coils are delivered inside the aneurysm to allow the filling of the cavity, and ultimately, stabilize the disease. However, coiling technique is difficult in the wide-necked aneurysm because of the risk of the coil dropping from aneurysm to parent artery. To solve this problem, an Enterprise stent as an intracranial stent, has been developed to support coils packed in the aneurysmal cavity. Several reports showed that the placement of multiple stents across the aneurysm neck improves the efficiency of flow diversion by reducing aneurysmal inflow. [2],[3] By using multiple stents and overlapping them at the neck of aneurysm, the effect of thrombosis was completed in a short time. By focusing on the flow diverting effects, new devices for endovascular treatments of aneurysms called flow diverters have been developed. [4],[5],[6] Flow diverter stents block the inlet flow into the aneurysm to induce thrombosis and make a new path of blood flow in a stand-alone mode. Since the flow diverters consist of the small cell design, their placement and position in regard with the neck of the aneurysm is no longer an issue. To quantitatively evaluate the effects of flow diversion, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been a key technology. In the previous research, computational fluid dynamics studies were carried out focusing on the flow diverting effects by comparing different mesh pattern. [7],[8],[9] However, these studies use conventional stents to evaluate their flow diverting effects, and there is no study that compares the flow diversion effects among multiple stents and flow diverters. To overcome these limitations of computational fluid dynamics, in this paper, we present quantitative data by comparing three kinds of commercially available stents (Enterprise, Silk, and Pipeline) in a patient-specific model. Moreover, we verify the differences of flow reduction effects among multiple stents and flow diverters. This is the first study analyzing the flow alterations among multiple Enterprise stents and flow diverters. | Figure 1: Fluoroscopic image of cerebral aneurysm (a) before surgery (b) after treatment with Enterprise stent and coils. Contrast media circulating in the blood stream do not enter to the aneurysm after the coil embolization. Red arrows point at the aneurysm
Click here to view |
| Materials and Methods | | |
Stent design
[Figure 2] shows the procedure for creating virtual 3D geometry of the flow diverters from two helices. We constructed the stents from oppositely oriented helix. Blue line in [Figure 2] shows clockwise helix whereas red line is counterclockwise helix. By placing these two types of spirals, we virtually reconstructed two kinds of commercial flow diverters, Silk and Pipeline. [Figure 3] shows the geometry of mesh of each flow diverter, and [Table 1] shows the parameters that determined the shape. α and β are the angles of two wires of mesh. L is the length of each side, and R is the diameter of wire. Mesh area of Silk and Pipeline are 0.07 mm 2 and 0.12 mm 2 , respectively. Coverage rate is a ratio between area of wire and area of cylinder surface. [Figure 4] shows the 3D models of Enterprise, Silk, and Pipeline stents. Diameter of the Silk and the Pipeline is 4 mm, and the length is 20 mm. We obtained the geometry of the Enterprise stent by using micro-CT scan. The resolution of micro-CT images was 20-μm and a 5-cm maximum field view. Diameter of Enterprise stent is 4 mm, and the length is 40 mm. | Figure 4: 3D data on stents, left: Silk, center: Pipeline, right: Enterprise
Click here to view |
Anatomical model for computational fluid dynamics
[Figure 5] shows a patient-specific aneurysm model served as control and all cases studied with stents for computational fluid dynamics analysis. The object is a part of IC-ophthalmic artery, and this is a major artery of the head and the neck that supplies blood to the brain in the human anatomy. A sphere-shaped object in this artery pointed by black arrow in [Figure 5] is an aneurysm. We reconstructed this model based on the clinical image data from 3D digital subtraction angiography (Philips Health Care, Best, The Netherlands). The diameter of the inlet is 5.88 mm, and the diameter of each outlet is 1.02 mm, 2.83 mm and 3.55 mm. Neck length of aneurysm is 4.75 mm and longitudinal diameter is 7.84 mm. | Figure 5: Analyzed five cases by computational fluid dynamics in this study. No stent case: Control, one enterprise stent case: Enterprise, two overlapped multiple Enterprise stent case: Multiple Enterprise, one flow diverter case: Silk, and one flow diverter case: Pipeline
Click here to view |
Fitting stents to vessel wall
In this study, we virtually mounted the stents to fit into the vessel wall and deployed across the aneurysm neck. We prepared five cases for CFD analysis as shown in [Figure 5]. They are: No stent case (Control), one Enterprise stent case (Enterprise), two overlapped multiple Enterprise stent cases (Multiple Enterprise), one flow diverter case (Silk), and one flow diverter case (Pipeline).
Property of working fluid
Although the blood is well-known to be non-Newtonian in general, we treated it as Newtonian in this study because apparent viscosity becomes nearly constant in an artery with relatively large diameter (1.0 mm) due to high velocity and shear rate. [10] The density and viscosity of blood were 1050 kg/m 3 and 3.5×10−3 Pas.
Numerical scheme and boundary condition
The governing equations include the Navier-Stokes equation of incompressible flows and the equation of continuity, where ρ is the density and u is the velocity.
In this calculation, we considered the flow in the cerebral aneurysm as incompressible, laminar, and steady-state. Also, we set Reynolds number as 600 to confirm dynamic similarity. The value of Reynolds number; i.e., 600, signifies the systolic phase wherein the flow volume is the maximum between pulsatile cycles. The definition of Reynolds number is as follows, where V is the mean velocity, D is the diameter of vessel inlet, and ν = μ/ρ is the kinematic viscosity.
Based on this equation and parameter of inlet diameter of artery model (5.88 mm), inlet velocity is 0.34 m/s. This calculation employs the finite-volume method, appropriate for complex geometry of vessels. All fluid regions are discretized with computational grids consisting of approximately 10-15 million tetrahedral elements. We created these elements by STAR-CCM, and the maximum element size is 0.03 mm. Regarding the calculation scheme, we selected the three-dimensional segregated solver and second-order implicit formulation in time. Pressure-Velocity coupling method is SIMPLE, and pressure term is PRESTO method. Momentum term of the Navier-Stokes equation is discretized with second-order upwind difference scheme and solved by algebraic multigrid (AMG).
| Results | | |
[Figure 6] shows the results of numerical simulation. From the left side, it shows the results of vessel model without stent (N-1, N-2, N-3, and N-4), Enterprise stent (E-1, E-2, E-3, and E-4), multiple Enterprise stents (ME-1, ME-2, ME-3, and ME-4), Silk (S-1, S-2, S-3, and S-4), and pipeline (P-1, P-2, P-3, and P-4). Each model contains visualized data on streamline, velocity of cross section around the neck of aneurysm, blood pressure, and wall shear stress. Based on these results, the flow into the aneurysm is affected by mesh pore size and pore density. | Figure 6: Visualized results of numerical simulation of four models. N: Control model, E: Enterprise stent model, ME: Multiple Enterprise stent model S: Silk model, P: Pipeline model
Click here to view |
Streamline
From the streamline plotted to visualize aneurysm flow patterns, vortex flow occurred in the case of control [[Figure 5], N-1]. Vortex in aneurysm becomes small in the following order: Enterprise stent, multiple Enterprise stents, Silk, and Pipeline. Moreover, mesh structure of the stents blocked the blood flow and decreased its velocity. Number of streamline was reduced relative to the increment of pore density. Especially in the case of S-1 (Silk) and P-1 (Pipeline), flow diverting effects reduced the volume of blood flow from the main artery into the aneurysm.
Velocity
The results of the velocity distribution of cross section around the neck of aneurysm are shown in [Figure 5] (N-2, E-2, ME-2, S-2, and P-2). Velocity of blood flow rapidly declined based on the stent structure. The most distinguishing feature is the case of Pipeline whereby the velocity of inner aneurysm was drastically reduced while the velocity of the main artery inside of the stent increased. Also, around the metallic-wire, there were low velocity areas that may lead to aggregation of platelets and thrombus of vessel. [Figure 7] represents the quantitative data on root mean square (RMS) velocity magnitude within the aneurysm. In each case, the velocity magnitude is averaged in the area of the aneurysm, and the red part in [Figure 7] is region of interest (ROI). The graph shows the reduction percentage of RMS velocity magnitude compared to the control. | Figure 7: Averaged root mean square (RMS) velocity magnitude within the aneurysm. Red part shows the ROI. Percentage values represent velocity reduction of each case compared to the control
Click here to view |
Pressure
The pressure for each model is summarized in the third line of [Figure 6]. From these images, it is difficult to see clear differences among these cases. Therefore, we quantified pressure on three regions of the aneurysm. Inflow covers an area of neck of aneurysm near the inlet. Dome covers the tip of the aneurysm, and outflow covers the neck area on the side of the outlet. We obtained and averaged the data from 10 points in the rectangle area (0.1×0.1 mm). [Figure 8] demonstrates the quantitative data on pressure over three regions of the aneurysm. There was a strong tendency indicating that pressure decreased from the inlet to the outlet. The reduction of blood pressure is recognized after the placement of intravascular devices. Mean pressure value at the inflow zone of each case is as follows: Control 43.56 Pa, Enterprise stent 28.23 Pa, Multiple Enterprise stents 12.44 Pa, Silk −4.97 Pa, and Pipeline −2.37 Pa. Around the distal area of aneurysm, pressure was reduced by the placement of stents. Mean pressure value at the dome of aneurysm in each case is as follows: Control 8.06 Pa, Enterprise stent 1.70 Pa, Multiple Enterprise stents 1.00 Pa, Silk −0.11 Pa, and Pipeline 1.44 Pa. The pressure around the outflow region is as follows: Control −16.63 Pa, Enterprise stent −10.46 Pa, Multiple Enterprise stents -28.84 Pa, Silk −6.14 Pa, and Pipeline −0.69 Pa. | Figure 8: Quantitative data on pressure over three parts of the aneurysm. outflow: Neck part of aneurysm near the outlet, dome: The tip of aneurysm, inflow: Neck of aneurysm near the inlet
Click here to view |
Considering the device effects of treatment, we focused on the inflow area. Enterprise stent caused the reduction of blood pressure, and its effect became clear with multiple Enterprise stents. On the other hand, in the case of flow diverters, such as Silk and Pipeline, blood pressure became negative pressure due to the effect of flow diversion. This is because the blood flow within the aneurysm is sucked into the main artery. Moreover, the region where we estimated as the inflow zone and the outflow zone in the Control case do not coincide with the same region of the flow diverters because vortex flow within the aneurysm cannot be seen in the case of Silk and Pipeline from the results of streamline in [Figure 6]. Thus, blood flow of the inflow zone became unstable and indicated the negative pressure. Blood pressure at the dome was lowered by the placement of Enterprise stent and flow diverters. However, the difference of value is small except for the control.
Wall shear stress
[Figure 6] (N-4, E-4, ME-4, S-4, and P-4) shows the results of wall shear stress over the aneurysm. In N-4, local high shear stress was observed around the neck. Especially around the area of neck, wall shear stress was decreased by placing Enterprise stent, Silk, and Pipeline. Area of low wall shear stress spread according to the mesh density of stents. [Figure 9] summarizes the quantitative data on wall shear stress over the aneurysm. In the area of inflow, the value of wall shear stress is reduced in proportion to the smallness of mesh. | Figure 9: Quantitative data on wall shear stress over three parts on the aneurysm outflow: Neck of aneurysm near the outlet, dome: The tip of aneurysm, inflow: Neck of aneurysm near the outlet
Click here to view |
We obtained the value of wall shear stress in the inflow area in the same manner as the pressure value: Control 7.24 Pa, Enterprise stent 4.74 Pa, Multiple Enterprise stents 0.92 Pa, Silk 0.38 Pa, and Pipeline 0.53 Pa. As for the dome area, the value of wall shear stress became nearly zero by placing flow diverter stents, such as Silk and Pipeline. The value is as follows: Control 2.25 Pa, Enterprise stent 1.43 Pa, Multiple Enterprise stents 0.64 Pa, Silk 0.29 Pa, and Pipeline 0.27 Pa. As for the outflow area, the value is as follows: Control 1.77 Pa, Enterprise stent 0.97 Pa, Multiple Enterprise stents 3.09 Pa, Silk 1.09 Pa, Pipeline 0.96 Pa. Aside from an exceptional case of multiple Enterprise stents around the outflow, wall shear stress within the aneurysm decreased as the pore size of stent was also lowered.
| Discussion | | |
The purpose of this article was to obtain quantitative data on flow diversion effects by comparing three kinds of commercially available stents in the patient-specific vessel model. Also, we verified the differences of flow reduction effects among multiple stents and flow diverters by computational fluid dynamics analysis. The study indicated that the mesh design such as size and density of pore affected the blood flow in the aneurysm. Flow diverters, Silk and Pipeline, declined the velocity of blood flow into the aneurysm that resulted in the reduction of pressure and wall shear stress. Flow diverter was approved as a treatment of aneurysm in 2011. Also, it has been used at limited medical facilities in Europe and the United States. In the clinical study of 101 intracranial aneurysms treated by Pipeline, they estimated the safety and efficacy of the device. [11] They reported that complete cure of the target lesions in 52%, morphological improvement in 36%, and no improvement in 12%. They concluded that Pipeline is a technically straightforward and relatively safe modality for the treatment of aneurysm, which is often difficult to treat by the coil assist stent, such as Enterprise. This favorable clinical effect of flow diverter is consistent with our simulation. However, some studies on the numerical simulation of artificial vessel model with placement of flow diverter reported increased pressure on the aneurysmal wall. [12] Pressure effect on aneurysm after the placement of flow diverter is being discussed and remains as one of the key issues. However, their results are consistent with our results wherein reduction effect of velocity and wall shear stress is in proportion to high density and small size of pore. It is well-known that the wall shear stress on the vessel wall plays key roles on degradation and rupture of aneurysm. [13] There are two schools of theory; one is high WSS theory whereas the other is low WSS theory. However, an inflammatory and atherosclerotic process triggered by low WSS has been reported in the growth of aneurysm. [14],[15],[16] Low WSS within aneurysm sac over the long term will cause degradation of the aneurysm wall and lead to rupture. [17] In the present case study, the value of WSS and pressure around the inflow zone and the dome area dropped dramatically in each case. However, the decline of average RMS velocity magnitude is not significant in the case of multiple Enterprise stents compared to the case of Pipeline. From the results of [Figure 7], the velocity reduction of multiple Enterprise stents and Pipeline are −5.40% and −30.64%, respectively. These results indicate that there is a possibility of increased risk of rupture in the case of multiple Enterprise stents, if the reduction effect of velocity within the aneurysm sac is not sufficient for clot formation. The current study has several limitations common to many computational fluid dynamics analyses that should be considered. These include: 1) assumption of vessel wall as a rigid body, 2) Newtonian blood properties and steady flow condition (rigid body and Newtonian blood properties may overestimate the pressure values), and 3) this study conducted numerical simulation in a single patient-specific vascular model at a location that may not be generalized. However, it is our hope that simulated results contribute to the understanding of hemodynamics in the aneurysm induced by various kind of stents.
The selection of the appropriate diameter and length of the device is a significant factor for efficiency of treatment. Implantation of an undersized device may result in poor fitness to the vessel wall with the risk of blood leakage. Placement of a device that exceeds the diameter of target artery may damage the tissue such as endothelial cells. Because of these clinical problems, proposed methods in this paper, "virtual stenting" demonstrate significant potentials to determine the flow alterations of different stents in an aneurysm model and extract the maximum outcome of treatment in advance of actual surgery. Consequently, this technology contributes to minimally invasive surgery. Moreover, our numerical simulation will contribute greatly toward designing optimized intravascular devices.
| Conclusions | | |
In this research, we present quantitative data on flow diversion effects by comparing three kinds of commercially available stents (Enterprise, Silk, and Pipeline) in the patient-specific vessel model. Also, we verify the differences of flow reduction effects for five cases (Control, one Enterprise, two overlapped Enterprise, one Silk, and one Pipeline). From the results, area of low wall shear stress and value of wall shear stress is reduced in proportion to the size of mesh, especially in the inflow area. Also, an Enterprise stent lowered blood pressure in the aneurysm, and its effect becomes clear with multiple Enterprise stents. Moreover, in the case of flow diverters, such as Silk and Pipeline, blood pressure becomes negative pressure due to the flow diversion effects. As for the change of velocity magnitude, the reduction percentage of multiple Enterprise stents and Pipeline are -5.40% and -30.64%, respectively. By using multiple stenting technique, we can expect the reduction effect of wall shear stress and pressure in the inflow and the dome areas. However, the reduction effect of velocity within the aneurysm sac by multiple stents is not as significant as flow diverters.
| References | | |
| 1. | Frank C Tong, Harry J Cloft, Jacques E Dion. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi Detachable Coils: Emphasis on new techniques. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2000;7:244 53. 
|
| 2. | Benndorf G, Herbon U, Sollmann WP, Campi A. Treatment of a ruptured dissecting vertebral artery aneurysm with double stent placement: Case report. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1844 8.
[PUBMED] |
| 3. | Doerfler A, Wanke I, Egelhof T, Stolke D, Forsting M. Double stent method: Therapeutic alternative for small wide necked aneurysms. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2004;100:150 4.
[PUBMED] |
| 4. | Kallmes DF, Ding YH, Dai D, Kadirvel R, Lewis DA, Cloft HJ. A new endoluminal, flow disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346 52.
[PUBMED] |
| 5. | Fiorella D, Albuquerque F, Gonzalez F, McDougall CG, Nelson PK. Reconstruction of the right anterior circulation with the Pipeline embolization device to achieve treatment of a progressively symptomatic, large carotid aneurysm. J Neurointerv Surg 2010;2:31 7.
[PUBMED] |
| 6. | Szikora I, Berentei Z, Kulcsar Z, Marosfoi M, Vajda ZS, Lee W, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: The Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139 47.
[PUBMED] |
| 7. | Kim M, Taulbee DB, Tremmel M, Meng H. Comparison of two stents in modifying cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:726 41.
[PUBMED] |
| 8. | Fu W, Gu Z, Meng X, Chu B, Qiao A. Numerical simulation of hemodynamics in stented internal carotid aneurysm based on patient specific model. J Biomech 2010;43:1337 42.
[PUBMED] |
| 9. | Kim YH, Xu X, Lee JS. The effect of stent porosity and strut shape on saccular aneurysm and its numerical analysis with lattice Boltzmann method. Ann Biomed Eng 2010;38:2274 92.
[PUBMED] |
| 10. | McDonald DA. Blood flow in arteries. 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold Publishers Limited; 1974.
|
| 11. | Augsburger L, Reymond P, Rufenacht DA, Stergiopulos N. Intracranial stents being modeled as a porous medium: Flow simulation in stented cerebral aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 2011;39:850 63.
[PUBMED] |
| 12. | Fischer S, Vajda Z, Aguilar Perez M, Schmid E, Hopf N, Bazner H, et al. Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: Initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012;54:369-82.
|
| 13. | Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 1999;282:2035 42.
[PUBMED] |
| 14. | Boussel L, Rayz V, McCulloch C, Martin A, Acevedo Bolton G, Lawton M, et al. Aneurysm growth occurs at region of low wall shear stress: Patient specific correlation of hemodynamics and growth in a longitudinal study. Stroke 2008;39:2997 3002.
|
| 15. | Davies PF, Spaan JA, Krams R. Shear stress biology of the endothelium. Ann Biomed Eng 2005;33:1714 8.
[PUBMED] |
| 16. | Sho E, Sho M, Hoshina K, Kimura H, Nakahashi TK, Dalman RL. Hemodynamic forces regulate mural macrophage infiltration in experimental aortic aneurysms. Exp Mol Pathol 2004;76:108 16.
[PUBMED] |
| 17. | Ujiie H, Tamano Y, Sasaki K, Hori T. Is the aspect ratio a reliable index for predicting the rupture of a saccular aneurysm? Neurosurgery 2001;48:495 502; discussion 502 3.
[PUBMED] |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9]
[Table 1]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Implementation of computer simulation to assess flow diversion treatment outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis |
|
| Mingzi Zhang,Simon Tupin,Hitomi Anzai,Yutaro Kohata,Masaaki Shojima,Kosuke Suzuki,Yoshihiro Okamoto,Katsuhiro Tanaka,Takanobu Yagi,Soichiro Fujimura,Makoto Ohta | | Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. 2021; 13(2): 164 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Computational Study of Hemodynamic Changes Induced by Overlapping and Compacting of Stents and Flow Diverter in Cerebral Aneurysms |
|
| Sunghan Kim,Hyeondong Yang,Ineui Hong,Je Hoon Oh,Yong Bae Kim | | Frontiers in Neurology. 2021; 12 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Predictors of the Effects of Flow Diversion in Very Large and Giant Aneurysms |
|
| H.J. Bae,Y.K. Park,D.Y. Cho,J.H. Choi,B.S. Kim,Y.S. Shin | | American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2021; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Form and Function in Intracranial Neurovascular Stents: A Historical Perspective and State-of-the-Art Clinical Review for the Noninterventionalist |
|
| M.T. Caton,A.Z. Copelan,K.H. Narsinh,D. Murph,A. A. Abla,D.L. Cooke,S.W. Hetts,V.V. Halbach,C.F. Dowd,R.T. Higashida,M.R. Amans | | Neurographics. 2021; 11(2): 96 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 5 |
Outcome of intracranial flow diversion according to the antiplatelet regimen used: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
|
| Anna Podlasek,Abdul Aziz Al Sultan,Zarina Assis,Nima Kashani,Mayank Goyal,Mohammed A Almekhlafi | | Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. 2020; 12(2): 148 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 6 |
Computational and experimental investigation of particulate matter deposition in cerebral side aneurysms |
|
| Mark Epshtein,Netanel Korin | | Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 2020; 17(169): 20200510 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 7 |
Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Jr Braided Stent Versus Atlas Self-Expandable Stent for Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single Center Experience |
|
| Andre Monteiro,Gustavo M Cortez,Amin Aghaebrahim,Eric Sauvageau,Ricardo A Hanel | | Neurosurgery. 2020; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 8 |
Hemodynamic Changes in the Carotid Artery after Infusion of Normal Saline Using Computational Fluid Dynamics |
|
| Ui Yun Lee,Chul In Kim,Gyung Ho Chung,Jinmu Jung,Hyo Sung Kwak | | Diagnostics. 2020; 10(7): 473 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 9 |
Hemodynamic differences by increasing low profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) stent local compaction across intracranial aneurysm orifice |
|
| Zhongbin Tian,Mingqi Zhang,Gaohui Li,Rongbo Jin,Xiaochang Leng,Ying Zhang,Kun Wang,Yisen Zhang,Xinjian Yang,Jianping Xiang,Jian Liu | | Interventional Neuroradiology. 2020; 26(5): 557 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 10 |
The Hemodynamic Effect of Flow Diverter Treatment of Intracranial Bifurcation Aneurysms |
|
| Linjing Peng,Jijie Chen,Yunzhang Cheng,Nan Lv,Hui Gao,Bin Bai | | Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering. 2020; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 11 |
Size-Dependent Distribution of Patient-Specific Hemodynamic Factors in Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms Using Computational Fluid Dynamics |
|
| Ui Yun Lee,Gyung Ho Chung,Jinmu Jung,Hyo Sung Kwak | | Diagnostics. 2020; 10(2): 64 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 12 |
Endovascular Treatment of Large or Giant Non-saccular Vertebrobasilar Aneurysms: Pipeline Embolization Devices Versus Conventional Stents |
|
| Jiejun Wang,Luqiong Jia,Zhibin Duan,Zhongxiao Wang,Xinjian Yang,Yisen Zhang,Ming Lv | | Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2019; 13 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 13 |
Efficacy of LVIS vs. Enterprise Stent for Endovascular Treatment of Medium-Sized Intracranial Aneurysms: A Hemodynamic Comparison Study |
|
| Wenqiang Li,Yang Wang,Yisen Zhang,Kun Wang,Ying Zhang,Zhongbin Tian,Xinjian Yang,Jian Liu | | Frontiers in Neurology. 2019; 10 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 14 |
Computational methods applied to analyze the hemodynamic effects of flow-diverter devices in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: current status and future directions |
|
| Lijian Xu,Bing Zhao,Xiaosheng Liu,Fuyou Liang | | Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices. 2019; : 100018 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 15 |
Basilar artery perforator aneurysms: Report of 9 cases and review of the literature |
|
| P. Bhogal,M. AlMatter,V. Hellstern,M. Aguilar Pérez,J. Lehmberg,O. Ganslandt,H. Bäzner,H. Henkes | | Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2019; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 16 |
Does stent type impact coil embolization outcomes in extended follow-up of small-sized aneurysms ( |
|
| Jeongjun Lee,Young Dae Cho,Dong Hyun Yoo,Hyun-Seung Kang,Won-Sang Cho,Jeong Eun Kim,Jusun Moon,Moon Hee Han | | Neuroradiology. 2018; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 17 |
Wall Shear Stress and Flow Patterns in Unruptured and Ruptured Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms Using Computational Fluid Dynamics |
|
| Ui Yun Lee,Jinmu Jung,Hyo Sung Kwak,Dong Hwan Lee,Gyung Ho Chung,Jung Soo Park,Eun Jeong Koh | | Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2018; 61(6): 689 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 18 |
In vitro angiographic comparison of the flow-diversion performance of five neurovascular stents |
|
| Ronak J Dholakia,Ari D Kappel,Andrew Pagano,Henry H Woo,Baruch B Lieber,David J Fiorella,Chander Sadasivan | | Interventional Neuroradiology. 2018; 24(2): 150 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 19 |
The Combined Use of Intraluminal and Intrasaccular Flow Diversion for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Report of 25 Cases |
|
| Pervinder Bhogal,Muhammad AlMatter,Victoria Hellstern,Oliver Ganslandt,Hansjörg Bäzner,Hans Henkes,Marta Aguilar-Pérez | | Neurointervention. 2018; 13(1): 20 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 20 |
A Case of Ruptured Blood Blister-like Aneurysm Treated with Pipeline Embolization Device: Clinical Significance of Fetal-type Posterior Communicating Artery |
|
| Ki-Su Park,Dong-Hun Kang,Won-Soo Son,Jaechan Park,Young-Sun Kim,Byung Moon Kim | | Neurointervention. 2017; 12(1): 40 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 21 |
Comparison of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization and the Pipeline Embolization Device for Endovascular Treatment of Ophthalmic Segment Aneurysms: A Multicenter Cohort Study |
|
| Nimer Adeeb,Christoph J. Griessenauer,Paul M. Foreman,Justin M. Moore,Rouzbeh Motiei-Langroudi,Michelle H. Chua,Raghav Gupta,Apar S. Patel,Mark R. Harrigan,Abdulrahman Y. Alturki,Christopher S. Ogilvy,Ajith J. Thomas | | World Neurosurgery. 2017; 105: 206 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 22 |
Endovascular Stenting and Coiling for Treatment of Traumatic Pseudoaneurysms of the Common Carotid Artery : A Case Report |
|
| Hiroya Shimauchi-Ohtaki,Masanori Aihara,Kaoru Aishima,Tatsuya Shimizu,Masahiko Tosaka,Yuhei Yoshimoto | | Japanese Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017; 26(5): 370 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 23 |
Evaluation of Enterprise Stent-Assisted Coiling and Telescoping Stent Technique as Treatment of Supraclinoid Blister Aneurysms of the Internal Carotid Artery |
|
| Ding Xu,Changwei Zhang,Ting Wang,Chaohua Wang,David F. Kallmes,Giuseppe Lanzino,Chao You,Xiaodong Xie | | World Neurosurgery. 2017; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 24 |
Hemodynamics of Flow Diverters |
|
| Ronak Dholakia,Chander Sadasivan,David J. Fiorella,Henry H. Woo,Baruch B. Lieber | | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2017; 139(2): 021002 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 25 |
Hemodynamic alterations after stent implantation in 15 cases of intracranial aneurysm |
|
| Chao Wang,Zhongbin Tian,Jian Liu,Linkai Jing,Nikhil Paliwal,Shengzhang Wang,Ying Zhang,Jianping Xiang,Adnan H. Siddiqui,Hui Meng,Xinjian Yang | | Acta Neurochirurgica. 2016; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 26 |
Hemodynamic Alterations for Various Stent Configurations in Idealized Wide-neck Basilar Tip Aneurysm |
|
| Chao Wang,Zhongbin Tian,Jian Liu,Linkai Jing,Nikhil Paliwal,Ying Zhang,Jianping Xiang,Adnan H. Siddiqui,Hui Meng,Shengzhang Wang,Xinjian Yang | | Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering. 2016; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 27 |
Flow diverter effect of LVIS stent on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: a comparison with Enterprise stents and the Pipeline device |
|
| Chao Wang,Zhongbin Tian,Jian Liu,Linkai Jing,Nikhil Paliwal,Shengzhang Wang,Ying Zhang,Jianping Xiang,Adnan H. Siddiqui,Hui Meng,Xinjian Yang | | Journal of Translational Medicine. 2016; 14(1) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 28 |
In Vitro Investigation of a New Thin Film Nitinol-Based Neurovascular Flow Diverter |
|
| M. H. Babiker,Y. Chun,B. Roszelle,W. Hafner,H. Y. Farsani,L. F. Gonzalez,F. Albuquerque,C. Kealey,D. S. Levi,G. P. Carman,D. H. Frakes | | Journal of Medical Devices. 2016; 10(4): 044506 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 29 |
Three Cases of Ruptured Basilar Artery Dissection: From Diagnosis to Endovascular Treatment |
|
| Anne-Laure Derelle,Charlotte Barbier,Romain Tonnelet,Liang Liao,René Anxionnat,Serge Bracard | | World Neurosurgery. 2016; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 30 |
Extra-Aneurysmal Flow Modification Following Pipeline Embolization Device Implantation: Focus on Regional Branches, Perforators, and the Parent Vessel |
|
| G. Gascou,K. Lobotesis,H. Brunel,P. Machi,C. Riquelme,O. Eker,A. Bonafé,V. Costalat | | American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2015; 36(4): 725 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 31 |
Hybrid stent device of flow-diverting effect and stent-assisted coil embolization formed by fractal structure |
|
| Masahiro Kojima,Keiko Irie,Kouhei Masunaga,Yasuhiko Sakai,Masahiro Nakajima,Masaru Takeuchi,Toshio Fukuda,Fumihito Arai,Makoto Negoro | | Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 2015; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 32 |
Overlapping stent-assisted coil embolization for partially thrombosed aneurysm presenting oculomotor nerve palsy: a case report |
|
| Yosuke WATANABE,Akihiko TAKECHI,Yoshinori KAJIWARA,Go SEYAMA | | Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy. 2015; 9(3): 150 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 33 |
A Finite Element Method to Predict Adverse Events in Intracranial Stenting Using Microstents: In Vitro Verification and Patient Specific Case Study |
|
| Francesco Iannaccone,Matthieu De Beule,Sander De Bock,Imramsjah M. J. Van der Bom,Matthew J. Gounis,Ajay K. Wakhloo,Matthieu Boone,Benedict Verhegghe,Patrick Segers | | Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2015; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 34 |
The study of valve hybrid fractal stent for the next generation brain intravascular treatment |
|
| Akihiko ICHIKAWA,Takahiro ITO,Kouhei SHIMOGAITO,Takashi KUBO,Toshio FUKUDA | | Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese). 2015; 81(830): 14-00635 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 35 |
The influence of flow diverter’s angle of curvature across the aneurysm neck on its haemodynamics |
|
| Kaavya Karunanithi,Chang Joon Lee,Winston Chong,Yi Qian | | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 2015; 229(8): 560 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 36 |
Pipeline Embolization Device for the Treatment of Intra- and Extracranial Fusiform and Dissecting Aneurysms |
|
| Sebastian Fischer,Marta Aguilar Perez,Wiebke Kurre,Guido Albes,Hansjörg Bäzner,Hans Henkes | | Neurosurgery. 2014; 75(4): 364 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 37 |
Novel technologies in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms |
|
| Scott L. Zuckerman,Ilyas M. Eli,Peter J. Morone,Michael C. Dewan,J. Mocco | | Neurological Research. 2014; 36(4): 368 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 38 |
Hemodynamic impact of cerebral aneurysm endovascular treatment devices: coils and flow diverters |
|
| Leonid Goubergrits,Jens Schaller,Ulrich Kertzscher,Thies Woelken,Moritz Ringelstein,Andreas Spuler | | Expert Review of Medical Devices. 2014; 11(4): 361 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 39 |
A Case of Thrombotic Giant Basilar-tip Aneurysm after Coil Embolization |
|
| Hiroshi MANAKA,Katsumi SAKATA,Tadao SHINOHARA,Yutaro TAKAYAMA,Takashi KAWASAKI | | Surgery for Cerebral Stroke. 2014; 42(5): 372 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 40 |
Analysis of flow changes in side branches jailed by flow diverters in rabbit models |
|
| Juan R. Cebral,Marcelo Raschi,Fernando Mut,Yong-Hond Ding,Daying Dai,Ramanathan Kadirvel,David Kallmes | | International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering. 2014; : n/a | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
 |
|
|
|
Search Pubmed for