An Official publication of The Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons (AsianCNS)

Search Article
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Advertise Subscribe Contacts Login  Facebook Tweeter
  Users Online: 673 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 653-659

Closure of skull base defects after endonasal endoscopic resection of planum sphenoidale and tuberculum sellae meningiomas


1 Department of Otolaryngology, Irmandade of Santa Casa de Misericórdia of São Paulo; Faculty of Medical Sciences of Santa Casa of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2 Faculty of Medical Sciences of Santa Casa of São Paulo; Discipline of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Irmandade of Santa Casa of Misericórdia of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
3 Faculty of Medical Sciences of Santa Casa of São Paulo; Departament of de Radiology, Irmanadade of Santa Casa of Misericórdia of São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Date of Submission23-Feb-2020
Date of Acceptance14-May-2020
Date of Web Publication28-Aug-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Williams Escalante Encinas
R. Dr. Cesário Mota Jr., 112 - Pavilhão Conde de Lara, SP
Brazil
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_62_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: The expanded endoscopic endonasal transplanum transtuberculum approach allows tumor removal by minimally invasive procedures. A large dural and bone defect is created during the surgical procedure, increasing the risk of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. Objective: The aim of this study is to describe a surgical technique and complications observed in patients undergoing endonasal resection of planum sphenoidale and/or tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with planum sphenoidale and/or tuberculum sellae meningiomas after expanded endoscopic endonasal resection between June 2013 and August 2018, in which autologous grafts, fascia lata inlay, and nasoseptal flap onlay were used for closure of skull base defects. Results: Ten patients were included in the analysis. No cases of postoperative CSF leakages or meningitis were reported, whereas two patients evolved with postoperative infectious complications (fungal ball in right frontal sinus and brain abscess). The skull base defect created for resection measured, on average, 3.58 cm2. Conclusion: Our experience suggests that closure of skull base defects using combined fascia lata inlay and nasoseptal flap onlay is effective for preventing postoperative CSF leakage in resection of planum sphenoidale and/or tuberculum sellae meningiomas, and offers high reproducibility due to its low cost.

Keywords: Cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningioma, skull base, surgical flaps


How to cite this article:
Dolci RL, Encinas WE, Monteiro AA, Kozechen Rickli JC, de Souza JL, Todeschini AB, Padilha IG, Zuppani HB, Leite dos Santos AR, Lazarini PR. Closure of skull base defects after endonasal endoscopic resection of planum sphenoidale and tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Asian J Neurosurg 2020;15:653-9

How to cite this URL:
Dolci RL, Encinas WE, Monteiro AA, Kozechen Rickli JC, de Souza JL, Todeschini AB, Padilha IG, Zuppani HB, Leite dos Santos AR, Lazarini PR. Closure of skull base defects after endonasal endoscopic resection of planum sphenoidale and tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Asian J Neurosurg [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 3];15:653-9. Available from: https://www.asianjns.org/text.asp?2020/15/3/653/293748


  Introduction Top


Skull base tumors are challenging, hard to access, and associated with high morbimortality. Endonasal endoscopic approaches, in selected cases, offer advantages over transcranial access, such as direct lesion access without the need for brain retraction, early devascularization of the tumor, removal of invaded bone and dura-mater, and better illumination and visualization of the surgical field.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6]

The rise in popularity of endoscopic skull base surgery, together with the advent of the nasoseptal flap, has drastically reduced rates of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, characterizing this surgical technique as revolutionary.[7],[8] Kassam et al.[2],[3],[4] carried out a systematization of the endoscopic expanded endonasal approach (EEA) [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Illustration depicting sagital plane of skull base, divided into areas of endoscopic approach. (A) transfrontal; (B) transcribriform; (C) transplanal; (D) transtuberculum; (E) transellar; (F) transclival; (G) transodontoid. Transplanal and transtuberculum region highlighted in Green. Source: Angelo Shuman/Ricardo Dolci (2018)

Click here to view


Transplanum and transtuberculum EEAs allow minimally-invasive, highly effective tumor resection. However, a large bone and dural defect is created during the surgical procedure, often associated with high-flow intraoperative CSF leaks [9] while posing a risk of postoperative CSF leakage.

Closure of the endoscopic craniectomy must be performed with care by isolating the intracranial compartment from the sinonasal compartment, where the nasoseptal flap plays a key role in this separation.[7],[10],[11] Closure can be carried out in multiple layers, using heterologous materials (dura-mater substitutes, bovine collagen sponges, oxidized cellulose meshes, fibrin sealant) or autologous materials (fat, nonvascularized flaps, microsurgical flaps with vascular anastomosis, pedicled flaps or muscle tissue).[10],[12],[13]

In the present study, we describe the surgical technique employing autologous material in two layers for skull base repair in patients submitted to endonasal endoscopic resection of planum sphenoidale or tuberculum sellae meningiomas using nasoseptal flap (onlay) and fascia lata (inlay). Associated complications were also investigated.


  Methods Top


A retrospective study was conducted based on the review of patient medical records and data collection after approval of the local Research Ethics Committee (permit CAEE-08113819.7.0000.5479). The study inclusion criteria were:

  1. Patients aged >18 years of both genders;
  2. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed diagnosis of planum sphenoidal or tuberculum sela meningioma;
  3. Patients submitted to endoscopic endonasal resection as a sole or initial treatment between June 2013 and August 2018;
  4. Intraoperative closure of skull base with the combined use of fáscia lata inlay and nasoseptal flap onlay.


The study exclusion criteria were:

  1. Patients classed as vulnerable (prisoners and pregnant women);
  2. Pediatric patients.


All patients were submitted to the surgical procedure by the institution's skull base team. All complications described in medical records were collected for up to 1 year after the surgery.

Within the first 24 h of surgery, patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scan of the head, sinuses, and face. The resultant images were retrieved from the institution's digital archive system (when available) and analyzed using the Osirix software program (Pixmeo, Switzerland) to calculate the area of the skull base defect.

Surgical technique

All cases were performed under general anesthetic, without the use of lumbar drain during the intra or postoperative periods, and prophylactic antibiotics were given in accordance with prevailing guidelines of the local hospital infection advisory committee.

After general anesthesia, patients were placed in the dorsal decubitus position with head clamped in a 3-pin fixation device. The head segment was positioned, relative to the body, with slight flexion, rotated to the right, and inclined to the left. The nasal cavity was prepared using asepsis followed by the application of a topical vasoconstrictor (adrenalin diluted in distilled water 1:1000). High-definition video and camera (Stryker 1488, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) were employed for the operation together with a 0, 30° and 45° Karl-Storz Hopkins II endoscope (Tuttlingen, Germany). All extended endoscopic endonasal approaches in the institution are performed jointly by the neurosurgery and otorhinolaryngology teams using the “4 hands” technique.

The procedure commenced with middle turbinectomy to the right with preservation of the upper third, followed by ipsilateral anterior and posterior ethmoidectomy. Except in cases with specific surgical indications or anatomical abnormalities, routine nasoseptal flap in the right nasal fossa was performed.[7],[8],[11],[14]

The nasoseptal flap is produced by making a superior incision just below the sphenoid ostium, continuing anteriorly toward the nasal septum, preserving approximately 1.5 cm of the superior portion of the septal mucosa to prevent olfactory injury, and extending to the columella region. The inferior incision is made just above the choana arch, creating a pedicle around 1.5 cm wide, where this must be preserved because it contains branches of the sphenopalatine artery which irrigates the septal mucosa. To achieve a large pedicled flap, in all cases, the incision was extended anteriorly along the nasal fossa floor below the inferior concha.

After producing the nasoseptal flap, the vomer and perpendicular plate of the ethmoid were removed, preserving 1.5 cm superiorly at the bone-cartilage transition point (posterior chondrotomy), creating a single posterior cavity to access both nostrils concomitantly. After chondrotomy, the posterior portion of the mucosa contralateral to the nasoseptal flap was used to patch the exposed cartilage of the nasal septum after producing the nasoseptal flap, as described by Caicedo-Granados et al. and denoted the reverse flap,[15] followed by placement of the nasal splint.

A large sphenoidectomy was performed to allow good visualization of the target area and facilitate handling of the surgical instruments, entailing complete exposure of the tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]a. After creating the nasoseptal flap and due preparation and exposure of the nasosinus cavity, the planum sphenoidale, tuberculum sellae and sella can be carefully drilled to the depth required for tumor resection [Figure 3]b and [Figure 3]c.
Figure 2: Imaging in cadaver using 0o optic. (a) Exposure of whole posterior wall of sphenoid sinus, for performing craniectomy using endoscopic approach. (b) Green highlights showing whole region of bone opening for access to tuberculum and planum sphenoidale region, exposing dura-mater. (c) Opening of dura-mater in region of upper boundary. (d) Opening of dura mater allows visualization of hypophyseal stalk, superior hypophyseal artery, optic chiasm and superior intercavernous sinus

Click here to view
Figure 3: Intraoperative view. Step by step of endoscopic surgical field using 0°, 30° and 45° optics respectively. (a) Panoramic view of the posterior wall of the sphenoidal sinus. A large sphenoidectomy was performed to allow good visualization of the target area. (b) Dura mater after the opening of the sellar floor and suprasellar region (craniectomy). (c) Enlargement of the initial craniectomy using a Kerrison Roungeur

Click here to view


This stage constitutes the endoscopic craniectomy in an inverted trapezoid shape; the lower boundary is the upper region of the sella (superior intercavernous sinus); the lateral boundaries are the optic canals, and the upper border depends on the anterior extension of the tumor, where very anterior planum sphenoidale tumors can reach as far as the region of the cribriform plate [Figure 2].[12]

To improve control of bleeding during the operation, dural veins should be coagulated beforehand, as well as the ipsilateral McConnell capsular artery (or both in larger tumors), which is often hypertrophied and predominantly responsible for irrigating the tumor.[16],[17]

The dural opening is made close to the midline, and the lesion thus identified. For larger tumors, tumor debulking is first carried out by removing intratumor fragments to aid manipulation. Subsequently, extracapsular dissection is commenced, observing the arachnoid planes surrounding the tumor to prevent damage to adjacent vascular or nerve structures [Figure 4]a.[6],[18]
Figure 4: (a) The dural opening is made close to the midline and the lesion is thus identified, tumor debulking is first carried out by removing intratumor fragments to aid manipulation. (b) Removing the entire tumor after be dissected from adjacent structures. (c) After tumor resection, copious irrigation of the surgical cavity is mandatory, along with thorough hemostasis

Click here to view


Traction and movement of the tumor must be done delicately in a bid to identify adherence. Only when all adherences have been detached by direct visualization can the tumor be removed. The tumor must not be removed aggressively, tractioning it downward, without first using the standard microsurgical traction and contra-traction techniques, while protecting key structures. The tumor can then be dissected from adjacent structures [Figure 4]b. After resection, copious irrigation of the surgical cavity is mandatory, along with thorough hemostasis [Figure 4]c.[6],[18]

The next stage is to harvest the fascia lata, where the lower limb has been placed in the position since the outset of surgery and aseptic preparation of the skin previously carried out. In general, slight bending of the knee and inner rotation of the hip aids the removal process.

A straight 3–4 cm incision is made into the anterolateral surface of the thigh with its axis parallel to the crural fascia. When necessary, the incision can be extended to 10–12 cm according to the size of the graft needed. In the present study, grafts measuring approximately 5 cm 2 sufficed.[19],[20]

After the thigh incision, fat can be collected if necessary. The dissection is deepened until identifying the fascia lata. The size of the graft to be removed can be slightly larger than the dural defect and after removal is preserved in saline until use. Hemostasis is checked to ensure no coagulations or hematomas within the incision and closure is layered using 2.0 nylon suture to draw together the removed fascia, followed by monocryl 3.0. Nylon suture 3.0 or 4.0 is used for skin closure and stitches are removed 10–15 days later depending on wound healing.

After tumor removal, irrigation and hemostasis are performed and the graft is inlayed into the skull base defect [Figure 5]a. This step must be done without folding, and the endonasal craniectomy region must be covered fully [Figure 5]b. The onlay nasoseptal flap must then be placed, with the perichondrial surface position onto the osseous part of the skull base [Figure 5]c. When positioning the flap, the surgeon must ensure the pedicle does not become twisted as this will compromise the irrigation of the flap and lead to necrosis [Figure 5]d.[21],[22]
Figure 5: (a) After harvested the fascia lata graft is placemented within of craniectomy. (b) Dural reconstruction was performed with an inlay fascia lata graft. (c) The onlay nasoseptal flap must then be placed with the perichondrial surface position onto the osseous part of the skull base and the pedicle does not become twisted as this will compromise irrigation of the flap and lead to necrosis. (d) The craniectomy region must be covered fully

Click here to view


To prevent displacement during patient movement, a number 16–18 Foley catheter is placed and inflated with direct visualization to guarantee mechanical support for the skull base reconstruction. Both nostrils are plugged with gauze pads soaked in antibiotic cream.

During the first 24 h after the surgery, patients must be rested. Walking is commenced 24 h after the surgical procedure. Patients must refrain from physical exertion and other activities which may increase intracranial pressure, for 4 weeks after the procedure. The nasal plug is removed on the 3rd–5th postoperative day.


  Results Top


A total of 10 patients (1 male: 9 female) satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected, of whom 8 had tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Preoperative tumor size was also measured for 6 patients revealing an average volume of 13.42 cm 2. Analysis of the postoperative skull base dural defect was carried out, having a mean area of 3.5 cm 2. No intraoperative complications were reported. Results of the analysis of demographics and tumor for each case are given in [Table 1] and [Figure 6].
Table 1: Results obtained in the case series

Click here to view
Figure 6: Computed tomography image of head performed in first 24 hours postoperatively using Osirix software (Pixmeo, Switzerland) showing area and size of craniectomy. Image reconstruction on sagital, coronal and axial planes. (a) Image showing tuberculum sellae; and (b) planum sphenoidale meningioma craniectomy

Click here to view


At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, no patients had developed meningitis or CSF leak.

One patient had an infectious complication indirectly related to the surgical procedure (fungal ball in right frontal sinus) 6 months after surgical meningioma resection. The condition evolved with moderate-to-severe headache in the right frontal sinus region and was diagnosed using CT face sinus scan. Combined Draf IIb surgery via an external approach (lynch incision) was performed with complete resolution of the clinical picture.

Another patient, on the 15th postoperative day, developed amaurosis and paresis of the abducens nerve (CN VI), whose investigation using head MRI disclosed a brain abscess which required external surgical intervention and endovenous antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks. The patient made a full recovery after the treatment. The information on patients included in this series is summarized in [Table 1].


  Discussion Top


A host of complications have been reported after endoscopic skull base surgery, such as hyposmia, nasal synechiae, nasal obstruction, transient or permanent hormone changes, and face paresthesia. However, CSF leakage and meningitis are relatively common complications that have a major impact on patient satisfaction and postoperative outcome.[14],[23],[24]

These complications are more common in EEA because of high-flow CSF leakage, given that breaching of the arachnoid plane, opening of the high-flow CSF cisterns or the ventricular system and large dural skull base defect occur with this approach, where these events were seen for all the cases in the present study. High rates of CSF leakage have been previously described (40%–50%) in EEAs. However, following the description and dissemination of multi-layer reconstruction in association with the nasoseptal flap, this rate has declined dramatically <3%.[7],[10],[23],[24],[25]

Harvey et al.[26] performed a systematic review analyzing endoscopic skull base surgery procedures with large dural defects (>3 cm 2) and intraoperative CFS leakage, and concluded that the use of vascularized flaps in the reconstruction of these large defects resulted in a postoperative CSF leak rate of 6.7%. This difference was statistically significant compared with a series using free grafts only. Other advantages of vascularized flaps are early epithelization, allowing earlier introduction of complementary therapy (radiotherapy) with lower rates of late leaks secondary to these treatments.[7],[10],[13],[14],[24],[27]

Some nuances regarding nasoseptal flaps are noteworthy, including the fact that the mucosa around the dural defect should be fully removed to allow the flap to make direct contact with the bone, else there is poor adherence of the vascularized flap, increasing the rate of CSF leakage. Nonremoval of the mucosa can also increase the risk of mucocele formation under the flap.[28],[29],[30]

Another important nuance for the closure of large skull base defects is that, when producing the nasoseptal flap, to make the more lateral inferior and superior incision and lower close to the sphenopalatine foramen, thereby allowing greater rotation and anteriorization of the resultant flap.[7],[8],[9]

In cases where the sphenoid sinus presents postsella pneumatization, fat from the abdomen or lower limb can be used to support the pedicle and its more posterior portion, thereby increasing its anterior reach.[27] In the present casuistic, use of fat in the reconstruction was not necessary. Finally, the flap should be fully supported against the skull base, with no dead space between the flap and skull base, as this also increases the risk of postoperative CSF leak [Figure 7].[7],[8],[9]
Figure 7: Magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months postoperatively showing well-lodged fascia lata inlay and nasoseptal flap and absence of “dead space” between nasoseptal flap and sphenoid sinuses, important for preventing post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leakage

Click here to view


Large skull base defects with high-flow CSF leaks, require careful multi-layer reconstruction using both autologous and heterologous materials.[10],[12],[23],[27],[31],[32],[33],[34] The technique employed in the present study, akin to that in Eloy et al.,[12] involved two-layer closure with autologous material, being an inlay fascia lata graft and an overlay vascularized flap, without use stitches or fibrin glue. This promoted a high level of efficacy, with no cases of CSF leakage or meningitis or complications involving the donor site (lower right limb).

The results suggest this is an effective and low-cost repair technique, in which only autologous material (fascia lata and nasoseptal flap) was used in the present study for defect reconstruction, dispensing with the need for dural substitutes, a rare situation in the literature.[8],[33],[34] The nonuse of heterologous materials for dural closure, its high efficacy and low cost makes this technique replicable in many centers.

Two cases of infectious complications were observed in the present series, although the fungal ball was not directly related to the surgery. By contrast, the second case with brain abscess was directly associated with the surgery. The use of fascia lata has been routine in neurosurgery since the 1990s and has proven safe with low infection rates (2.3%).[35],[36] However, we do not attribute the infectious complications in the present series to the materials used, given the autologous materials were harvested from the donor site at the time of use.

The use of fat for defect closure, particularly in the skull base, is also routine. Despite publications reporting the safety of fat use,[37] there have been some reports of complications related to its intradural use, such as aseptic meningitis, lipoid dissemination by the meninges, and local inflammatory reaction.[38],[39],[40],[41] In view of these problems, the proximity to delicate nerve structures, such as the optic apparatus and vascular structures, together with the team's experience at our institution, we avoid intradural fat, reserving its use for the sinonasal cavity when the flap requires mechanical support. This use was not needed in any of the cases reported.

The area of the endonasal craniectomy was 3.58 cm 2 in the present study, lower than the average reported by Eloy et al. of 5.6 cm 2.[12] The craniotomy area directly correlates with tumor location and size and tends to be greater in planum sphenoidale meningiomas. With the accrual of more years of experience, our team is now using increasingly larger dural openings, owing to the higher surgical safety for tumor removal and dural defect repair.


  Conclusion Top


EEA constitutes an effective low-cost surgical technique involving two layers of autologous material (fascia lata inlay and nasoseptal flap onlay) for resection of planum sphenoidale and tuberculum sellae meningiomas using extended approaches to the skull base. The technique is highly replicable in many different institutions and does not negatively impact the quality of patient treatment.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Acknowledgment

We express our many thanks Suely Orlandeli, Administrative Assistant of Publications from Faculty of Medical Sciences of Santa Casa of São Paulo, for her assistance in preparing and completing this manuscript.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Cappabianca P, Alfieri A, de Divitiis E. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to the sella: Towards functional endoscopic pituitary surgery (FEPS). Minim Invasive Neurosurg 1998;41:66-73.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: The rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg Focus 2005;19:E3.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: The rostrocaudal axis. Part II. Posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum. Neurosurg Focus 2005;19:E4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Kassam AB, Gardner P, Snyderman C, Mintz A, Carrau R. Expanded endonasal approach: Fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. Neurosurg Focus 2005;19:E6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Stamm AM. Transnasal endoscopy-assisted skull base surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2006;196:45-53.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Todeschini AB, Otto BA, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM. Endoscopic endonasal approaches for the management of skull base meningiomas: Selection criteria and clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg Sci 2018;62:617-26.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, Mataza JC, Kassam A, Snyderman CH, et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: Vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1882-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Kassam AB, Thomas A, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Vescan A, Prevedello D, et al. Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery 2008;63:ONS44-52.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Esposito F, Dusick JR, Fatemi N, Kelly DF. Graded repair of cranial base defects and cerebrospinal fluid leaks in transsphenoidal surgery. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2007;60:295-303.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Liu JK, Schmidt RF, Choudhry OJ, Shukla PA, Eloy JA. Surgical nuances for nasoseptal flap reconstruction of cranial base defects with high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leaks after endoscopic skull base surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2012;32:E7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Pinheiro-Neto CD, Snyderman CH. Nasoseptal flap. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2013;74:42-55.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Eloy JA, Shukla PA, Choudhry OJ, Singh R, Liu JK. Challenges and surgical nuances in reconstruction of large planum sphenoidale tuberculum sellae defects after endoscopic endonasal resection of parasellar skull base tumors. Laryngoscope 2013;123:1353-60.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Li Z, Ji T, Huang GD, Guo J, Yang JH, Li WP. A stratified algorithm for skull base reconstruction with endoscopic endonasal approach. J Craniofac Surg 2018;29:193-8.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Dolci RL, Miyake MM, Tateno DA, Cançado NA, Campos CA, Dos Santos AR, et al. Postoperative otorhinolaryngologic complications in transnasal endoscopic surgery to access the skull base. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2017;83:349-55.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Caicedo-Granados E, Carrau R, Snyderman CH, Prevedello D, Fernandez-Miranda J, Gardner P, et al. Reverse rotation flap for reconstruction of donor site after vascular pedicled nasoseptal flap in skull base surgery. Laryngoscope 2010;120:1550-2.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Ditzel Filho LF, Prevedello DM, Jamshidi AO, Dolci RL, Kerr EE, Campbell R, et al. Endoscopic endonasal approach for removal of tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2015;26:349-61.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ferrareze Nunes C, Beer-Furlan A, Doglietto F, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM. The McConnell's capsular arteries and their relevance in endoscopic endonasal approach to the sellar region. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2018;14:171-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Todeschini AB, Shahein M, Montaser AS, Hardesty D, Otto BA, Carrau RL, et al. Giant olfactory groove meningioma-2-staged approach: 2-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2019;16:115-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Amir A, Gatot A, Zucker G, Sagi A, Fliss DM. Harvesting large fascia lata sheaths: A rational approach. Skull Base Surg 2000;10:29-34.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Amir A, Gur E, Gatot A, Zucker G, Cohen JT, Fliss DM. Fascia lata sheaths harvest revisited. Oper Tech Otolayngol Head Neck Surg 2000;11:304-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Chabot JD, Patel CR, Hughes MA, Wang EW, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA, et al. Nasoseptal flap necrosis: A rare complication of endoscopic endonasal surgery. J Neurosurg 2018;128:1463-72.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Campbell RG, Otto BA, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL. How I do it: Modification of the posterior pedicled nasoseptal flap for clival and nasopharyngeal surgery. Aust J Otolaryngol 2018;1:13.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Gardner PA, Kassam AB, Thomas A, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, et al. Endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior cranial base meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2008;63:36-52.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Zanation AM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Germanwala AV, Gardner PA, Prevedello DM, et al. Nasoseptal flap reconstruction of high flow intraoperative cerebral spinal fluid leaks during endoscopic skull base surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2009;23:518-21.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Pant H, Bhatki AM, Snyderman CH, Vescan AD, Carrau RL, Gardner P, et al. Quality of life following endonasal skull base surgery. Skull Base 2010;20:35-40.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Harvey RJ, Parmar P, Sacks R, Zanation AM. Endoscopic skull base reconstruction of large dural defects: A systematic review of published evidence. Laryngoscope 2012;122:452-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Tang IP, Carrau RL, Otto BA, Prevedello DM, Kasemsiri P, Ditzel L, et al. Technical nuances of commonly used vascularised flaps for skull base reconstruction. J Laryngol Otol 2015;129:752-61.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Karligkiotis A, Meloni F, Herman P, Castelnuovo P. How to avoid mucocele formation under pedicled nasoseptal flap. Am J Otolaryngol 2014;35:546-7.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Vaezeafshar R, Hwang PH, Harsh G, Turner JH. Mucocele formation under pedicled nasoseptal flap. Am J Otolaryngol 2012;33:634-6.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Vaezeafshar R, Hwang PH, Turner JH. Commentary on “How to avoid mucocele formation under pedicled nasoseptal flap”. Am J Otolaryngol 2014;35:547.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Cavallo LM, Messina A, Esposito F, de Divitiis O, Dal Fabbro M, de Divitiis E, et al. Skull base reconstruction in the extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for suprasellar lesions. J Neurosurg 2007;107:713-20.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Eloy JA, Choudhry OJ, Friedel ME, Kuperan AB, Liu JK. Endoscopic nasoseptal flap repair of skull base defects: Is addition of a dural sealant necessary? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;147:161-6.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Eloy JA, Kuperan AB, Choudhry OJ, Harirchian S, Liu JK. Efficacy of the pedicled nasoseptal flap without cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion for repair of skull base defects: Incidence of postoperative CSF leaks. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012;2:397-401.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Tabaee A, Anand VK, Brown SM, Lin JW, Schwartz TH. Algorithm for reconstruction after endoscopic pituitary and skull base surgery. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1133-7.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Parizek J, Mericka P, Husek Z, Suba P, Spacek J, Nemecek S, et al. Detailed evaluation of 2959 allogeneic and xenogeneic dense connective tissue grafts (fascia lata, pericardium, and dura mater) used in the course of 20 years for duraplasty in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1997;139:827-38.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Thammavaram KV, Benzel EC, Kesterson L. Fascia lata graft as a dural substitute in neurosurgery. South Med J 1990;83:634-6.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Taha AN, Almefty R, Pravdenkova S, Al-Mefty O. Sequelae of autologous fat graft used for reconstruction in skull base surgery. World Neurosurg 2011;75:692-5.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Ricaurte JC, Murali R, Mandell W. Uncomplicated postoperative lipoid meningitis secondary to autologous fat graft necrosis. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30:613-5.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Ray J, D'Souza AR, Chavda SV, Walsh AR, Irving RM. Dissemination of fat in CSF: A common finding following translabyrinthine acoustic neuroma surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 2005;30:405-8.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
McAllister JD, Scotti LN, Bookwalter JW. Postoperative dissemination of fat particles in the subarachnoid pathways. Am J Neuroradiol 1992;13:1265-7.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Hwang PH, Jackler RK. Lipoid meningitis due to aseptic necrosis of a free fat graft placed during neurotologic surgery. Laryngoscope 1996;106:1482-6.  Back to cited text no. 41
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
<
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Methods
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed244    
    Printed3    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded45    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal