An Official publication of The Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons (AsianCNS)

Search Article
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Advertise Subscribe Contacts Login  Facebook Tweeter
  Users Online: 5 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

   Table of Contents      
CASE REPORT
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 786-793

Rare cases of contrast-induced encephalopathies


1 Department of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan; Department of Neurosurgery, Apollo Speciality Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
4 Department of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan; Department of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala, India

Date of Submission26-Feb-2020
Date of Acceptance29-Apr-2020
Date of Web Publication28-Aug-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Kazutaka Nakao
Department of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi
Japan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_68_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Cortical blindness (CB) due to contrast-induced encephalopathy is a rare complication in endovascular procedure. Although exact mechanism is not known, disruption of blood–brain barrier (BBB) by contrast agent is supposed to be caused. We report two cases of contrast-induced encephalopathies after coil embolization of unruptured aneurysm. A 68-year-old woman with unruptured basilar artery aneurysm was treated with endovascular stent-assisted coil embolization. The procedure was successfully accomplished within 172 min using about 160 ml of contrast medium (iopamidol). However, she manifested with CB 3 h after the procedure and seizure on the next day. Immediate computed tomography revealed the cortical enhancement in both occipital lobes. Diffusion-weighted imaging–magnetic resonance imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence 1 day after the procedure revealed edema in both occipital lobes with no findings of ischemia or hyperperfusion. Electroencephalography showed sharp and slow waves in both occipital lobes. She required endotracheal intubation on day 2 to maintain airways and breathing. Her sensorium improved 4 days after the procedure with administration of steroid and anticonvulsant. She was extubated on day 4 after the procedure. She was discharged with persisting CB as a sequel.

Keywords: Cerebral angiogram, computed tomography angiogram, contrast-induced encephalopathy, cortical blindness


How to cite this article:
Nakao K, Joshi G, Hirose Y, Tanaka R, Yamada Y, Miyatini K, Thavara BD, Kawase T, Kato Y. Rare cases of contrast-induced encephalopathies. Asian J Neurosurg 2020;15:786-93

How to cite this URL:
Nakao K, Joshi G, Hirose Y, Tanaka R, Yamada Y, Miyatini K, Thavara BD, Kawase T, Kato Y. Rare cases of contrast-induced encephalopathies. Asian J Neurosurg [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 1];15:786-93. Available from: http://www.asianjns.org/text.asp?2020/15/3/786/293749


  Introduction Top


Contrast-induced encephalopathy (CIE) is a rare complication of endovascular interventions. The presentations may include cortical blindness (CB), hemiparesis, seizure, and coma. In most reported cases, the symptoms are self-limiting but may become fatal.[1] Here, we document a case of permanent CB in CIE after digital subtraction angiography for aneurysmal coiling using iopamidol, which is a type of nonionic monomer low-osmolar contrast agent. Another case of CIE became fatal.


  Case Reports Top


Case report 1

A 68-year-old woman presented to us with unruptured basilar artery aneurysm. She had undergone clipping of internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm 8 years back. The size of basilar artery to aneurysm was 5 mm 8 years back. The patient was on regular clinical and radiological follow-up with us. Recent imaging showed an increase in size of aneurysm from 5 to 8 mm. Therefore, coiling of basilar top aneurysm was planned. On admission, her neurological examination was normal. Her medical history included hypertension on medical management.

Cerebral angiogram revealed an 8-mm size unruptured basilar top aneurysm [Figure 1]a. She underwent endovascular procedure with contrast iodinated agent for basilar tip aneurysm. She received 260 ml of iopamidol for angiogram and stent-assisted coiling. The procedural time was 172 min. (We used 6-Fr guiding catheter, 4.2-Fr microcatheter, and target 360 coil.) The procedure was uneventful. The neurological examination was normal at the end of the procedure.
Figure 1: (a) Cerebral angiogram showing basilar tip aneurysm before coiling. (b) Cerebral angiogram showing obliteration of basilar tip aneurysm after coiling

Click here to view


The cerebral angiogram showed complete obliteration of basilar tip aneurysmal sac with no coil migration [Figure 1]b.

The patient complained of decreased vision in both eyes 3 h after the procedure. Computed tomography (CT) brain [Figure 2] was performed which showed subarachnoid contrast enhancement in bilateral occipital lobe sulci with loss of gray-white differentiation and sulcal effacement.
Figure 2: Computed tomography brain after the procedure

Click here to view


There was no intracerebral hemorrhage. She was treated with aspirin 100 mg/day, clopidogrel 75 mg/day, and argatroban.

On postprocedure day 1, she developed generalized convulsions. She was treated with levetiracetam 1 g/day, phenobarbital 750 mg/day, and methylprednisolone 500 mg/day to control seizure. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain and electroencephalogram (EEG) were performed.

EEG showed slow and sharp waves in bilateral occipital lobes [Figure 3].
Figure 3: EEG showing sharp and slow waves in bilateral occipital lobes

Click here to view


MRI showed hyperintensities in fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence. There was no restriction in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequence of MRI brain [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Magnetic resonance imaging brain on day 2

Click here to view


CT brain done after 48 h showed resolution of contrast enhancement [Figure 5].
Figure 5: Computed tomography brain after 48 h

Click here to view


The patient became drowsy on postprocedure day 2 and hence intubated. Her sensorium gradually improved on day 4, and subsequently, she was extubated. Her sensorium completely improved on day 6 after the procedure. There were no further seizure episodes. CT brain done on day 5 [Figure 6] showed no bleed or infarct with persistence of hypodensities in both occipital lobes.
Figure 6: Computed tomography brain on postoperative day 5

Click here to view


She was discharged from hospital with persisting CB on the 7th postprocedural day.

Case report 2

Here, we discuss a 62-year-old woman with no comorbidities presented to our hospital with unruptured right cavernous ICA aneurysm. Coiling of the right cavernous aneurysm was planned after cerebral angiogram findings [Figure 7].
Figure 7: Angiogram showing right cavernous internal carotid artery aneurysm

Click here to view


Stent-assisted coiling was performed for cavernous ICA aneurysm. Coil migration was noted into the distal ICA during the procedure. Migrated coil was extracted with stent retrieval device [Figure 8].
Figure 8: Angiogram showing coil migration

Click here to view


Stent-assisted coiling was performed. The figure shows obliteration of aneurysmal sac by coils, and luminal patency of ICA is maintained by the stent at the end of the procedure.

Her neurological examination was normal at the end of the procedure (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS]-15).

A CT scan [Figure 9] was performed at the end of coiling, which showed blood and contrast extravasation in the right frontoparietal area. Her GCS was 15 without any neurological deficits.
Figure 9: Computed tomography at the end of the procedure

Click here to view


She developed left hemiparesis and became drowsy 3 h after the procedure. Her right pupil was dilated. A CT scan brain [Figure 10] showed a redistribution of sulcal hyperdensities in both hemispheres (right > left).
Figure 10: Computed tomography brain 3 h after the procedure

Click here to view


Her sensorium deteriorated rapidly 14 h after the procedure. GCS was 4. CT brain [Figure 11] showed hydrocephalus. She was intubated to maintain airway and electively ventilated. An external ventricular drainage was inserted for hydrocephalus [Figure 12].
Figure 11: Computed tomography brain 14 h after the procedure\

Click here to view
Figure 12: External ventricular drain for hydrocephalus

Click here to view


CT scan brain on day 2 [Figure 13] and day 3 [Figure 14] showed persistent hyperdensities with severe edema and mass effect. The patient was treated with anticonvulsants, steroids, and anti-edema measures. The patient died 3 days after the procedure.
Figure 13: Computed tomography brain on day 2 after the procedure

Click here to view
Figure 14: Computed tomography brain 3 days after the procedure

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


We reviewed literature on CIE by 16 authors comprising 27 cases (including 2 from our series) [Table 1].
Table 1: Review of literature

Click here to view


CIE affected all age groups. The youngest reported in the study was 17 years old and the eldest was 82 years old. Both sexes were affected (male: 10, female: 1). Females were more involved than male population.

Most of the symptoms were noticed within few 12 h after the procedure. Three patients had symptoms during intervention, 9 occurred immediately after completion of intervention, 5 happened within 1 h of intervention, 3 occurred within 3 h of intervention, and 6 occurred within 6–12 h after intervention.

CB, altered sensorium, and hemiparesis were the most common neurological findings noticed after CIE [Table 2].
Table 2: Clinical features

Click here to view


Cortical blindness

The incidence of CB was 1% with contrast cerebral angiography.[16] CB is characterized by partial or complete loss of perceived vision, normal fundi, normal pupillary reflexes, and unaltered extraocular movements. The onset of CB occurs from minutes up to 12 h after angiography. In most of the cases, blindness resolved, but in our case, CB persisted.

We reviewed these patients for the region of the brain involved. The literature showed an affinity of the occipital lobe in CIE [Table 3].
Table 3: Regions of brain involved

Click here to view


Why occipital lobe and visual cortex?

BBB (blood brain barrier) is incomplete in the posterior cerebral circulation, hence, occipital lobes and visual cortex are more susceptible locations for contrast induced encephalopathies.[16],[17]

Niimi et al.[7] reported four cases of CB due to endovascular procedure. They performed 137 intra-arterial treatment procedures for posterior circulation aneurysms & identified cortical blindness as complication in 4 patients. During the same time period, they treated 500 anterior cerebral circulation aneurysms without this complication.[7]

They identified four patients with cerebral vision loss complications. During the same time period, 500 aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation were treated without this complication. In his series, the visual field loss was unilateral in two and bilateral in two patients. Recovery was complete in three patients and almost normal in the fourth patient. The amount of contrast used and the duration of the procedure were similar among all patients. The four patients had no identified specific risk factors for developing procedure-associated occipital dysfunction.

In most of the cases, symptoms were self-resolving and less fatal. The time for radiological recovery ranged from 1 day to 12 months

Review of radiology findings in contrast-induced encephalopathy

The clinical features of CIE resemble neurological deficit due to embolism and hemorrhagic complications following angiography or endovascular interventions. Typical radiological findings include abnormal cortical contrast enhancement and edema, subarachnoid contrast enhancement, and striatal contrast enhancement – if the CT is performed soon after presentation. The enhancement resolves by 25 h in most of the cases. The diagnosis of contrast encephalopathy is, therefore, made by finding typical CT findings.[11]

The possible risk factors for contrast encephalopathy include hypertension and renal failure.[9] Roccatagliata et al.,[5] in their patients, obtained DWI sequence of MRI brain 3.5 h after symptom onset. It did not demonstrate any signal abnormality, thereby ruling out the presence of ischemic brain tissue within a time window useful for acute stroke management with thrombolysis. The complete absence of signal abnormality on initial DWI and a normal follow-up CT makes an embolic mechanism highly unlikely in our patient even if cases of falsely negative DWI studies have been reported.

Review of pathophysiology of contrast-induced encephalopathy

The mechanism of CIE is controversial. The disruption of the BBB after injection of the iodinated contrast agent is considered for this pathology.

Hyperosmolar contrast solutions cause water to diffuse out of the endothelial cells causing them to dehydrate and shrink in size. This decrease in size results in an opening of the tight junctions between the endothelial cells of the BBB allowing the iodinated materials to move into the neuronal tissues.[18] Thus, under the conditions of intravenous injection, contrast media with lower osmolality should possess fewer neurotoxic effects.

The neurotoxicity of contrast medium appears inversely related to the hydrophilicity of the agent. Wible et al.[19] performed animal experiments on a rat with ionic and nonionic contrast agents. They injected the contrast agent into cerebral cisterns of rat. Rats were monitored for seizures, dyspnea, blindness, and death. They reported that IOPROMIDE is lethal at small doses compared to other nonionic contrast material.

Iopromide is the most common contrast agent associated with this condition. 10 out of 26 were associated with this contrast (38%). All types of iodinated contrast agents can induce the development of neurotoxicity. Iopromide is a nonionic monomer low-osmolar contrast agent, which has been reported in cases of reversible CIE.[20],[21]

The volume of contrast ranged from 12 cc of ionic contrast to 384 cc of nonionic contrast.

The time for clinical recovery was 12 h to 12 months. One patient died after 56 days. The patient in our study died after 48 h. One patient had recovered from hemiparesis but had spasticity in limbs even after a year.

Zhao et al.[1] reported death of a 71-year-old woman after cerebral angiogram during evaluation of tinnitus. The patient went into coma during the procedure and died 56 days after the procedure.[1]

Literature analysis showed CB as a manifestation of CIE in 12 patients. All have bilateral occipital lobe involvements on CT brain scan. All patients had clinical and radiological resolution within in weeks after the procedure with conservative treatment. In our case, CB persisted even after radiological resolution. Therefore, CB due to contrast cerebral angiogram may not resolve in all cases (even after radiological resolution).

In our second case report, the patient died on the 3rd day after the procedure. Only one case fatality due to CIE was reported in the literature.[1]

This observation and a review of the literature highlight that CIE may not always have a benign outcome and can cause permanent deficits. This potential harmful effect should be recognized by the angiographer and the interventionist.[11]


  Conclusion Top


Although contrast-induced CB is self-resolving and associated with benign outcomes in previous studies, we present a case of permanent CB after DSA using iopamidol for aneurysmal coiling in the posterior circulation. Another case of CIE was fatal. Unfortunately, there is no effective treatment currently available for such a severe CIE. Further studies are needed to prevent the occurrence of severe complications and effective treatment.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patients consent forms. In the form the patients have given their consent for images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Zhao W, Zhang J, Song Y, Sun L, Zheng M, Yin H, et al. Irreversible fatal contrast-induced encephalopathy: A case report. BMC Neurol 2019;19:46.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Potsi S, Chourmouzi D, Moumtzouoglou A, Nikiforaki A, Gkouvas K, Drevelegas A. Transient contrast encephalopathy after carotid angiography mimicking diffuse subarachnoid haemorrhage. Neurol Sci 2012;33:445-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Haussen DC, Modir R, Yavagal DR. Unilateral contrast neurotoxicity as a stroke mimic after cerebral angiogram. J Neuroimaging 2013;23:231-3.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Guimaraens L, Vivas E, Fonnegra A. Transient encephalopathy from angiographic contrast: a rare complication in neurointerventional procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010; 33: 383-388.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Roccatagliata L, Taveira-Lopes L, Rossignol MD, Biondi A. cortical blindness and retrograde amnesia following cerebral angiography studied by early diffusion weighted MR imaging. A case report. Neuroradiol J 2009;22:600-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Till V, Koprivsek K, Stojanovic S, Avramov P, Vulekovic P. Transient cortical blindness following vertebral angiography in a young adult with cerebellar haemangioblastoma. Pediatr Radiol 2009;39:1223-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Niimi Y, Kupersmith MJ, Ahmad S, Song J, Berenstein A. Cortical blindness, transient and otherwise, associated with detachable coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:603-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Shinoda J, Ajimi Y, Yamada M, Onozuka S. Cortical blindness during coil embolization of an unruptured intracranial aneurysm-case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2004;44:416-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Saigal G, Bhatia R, Bhatia S, Wakhloo AK. MR findings of cortical blindness following cerebral angiography: Is this entity related to posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:252-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Lantos G. Cortical blindness due to osmotic disruption of the blood-brain barrier by angiographic contrast material: CT and MRI studies. Neurology 1989;39:567-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Leong S, Fanning NF. Persistent neurological deficit from iodinated contrast encephalopathy following intracranial aneurysm coiling. A case report and review of the literature. Interv Neuroradiol 2012;18:33-41.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Dangas G, Monsein LH, Laureno R, Peterson MA, Laird JR Jr., Satler LF, et al. Transient contrast encephalopathy after carotid artery stenting. J Endovasc Ther 2001;8:111-3.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Hsiu-Yu F, Yeh-Lin K, Chiung-Jen W. Transient contrast encephalopathy after carotid artery stenting mimicking diffuse subarachnoid hemorrhage: A case report. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;73:123-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Numaguchi Y, Fleming MS, Hasuo K, Puyau FA, Nice CM Jr. Blood-brain barrier disruption due to cerebral arteriography: CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984;8:936-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kubota T, Yamazaki T, Maeda M, Koujo T, Nakanishi T, Senoo M, et al. A case of contrast-induced encephalopathy after coil embolization of unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysm. Surg Cereb Stroke 2013;41:116-122.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Studdard WE, Davis DO, Young SW. Cortical blindness after cerebral angiography. Case report. J Neurosurg 1981;54:240-4.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Horwitz NH, Wener L. Temporary cortical blindness following angiography. J Neurosurg 1974;40:583-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Waldron RL 2nd, Bridenbaugh R, Purkenson M, Dempsey EW. The effect of angiographic contrast media at the cellular level in the brain. Radiology 1973;108:187-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Wible JH Jr., Barco SJ, Scherrer DE, Wojdyla JK, Adams MD. Neurotoxicity of non-ionic X-ray contrast media after intracisternal administration in rats. Eur J Radiol 1995;19:206-11.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Parry R, Rees JR, Wilde P. Transient cortical blindness after coronary angiography. Br Heart J 1993;70:563-4.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Kamata J, Fukami K, Yoshida H, Mizunuma Y, Moriai N, Takino T, et al. Transient cortical blindness following bypass graft angiography. A case report. Angiology 1995;46:937-46.  Back to cited text no. 21
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13], [Figure 14]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
<
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Case Reports
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed85    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded18    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal